Political Truth.
Whether you like it or not.

Friday, June 26, 2015

Scott Walker Took Money From Racist Cabal that Inspired Dylann Roof’s Terrorist Attack

Add Scott Walker (R-WI) to the list, as it's revealed that he took thousands from the Council of 'Conservative' Citizens (CofCC).…
scott walker
The list of Republicans who took money from a known hate group keeps growing. Add Scott Walker (R-WI) to the list, as it’s revealed that he took thousands from the Council of 'Conservative' Citizens (CofCC).
The moron is expected to announce his 2016 candidacy any day now.
Scott Walker is going to forfeit $3,500 in gubernatorial campaign donations that came from the wingnut hate cabal that inspired the racist terrorist attack by Dylann Roof, according to report by the Guardian :
Following an inquiry from the Guardian, a spokeswoman for Walker said he would be giving up money he received in recent years from Earl Holt, the president of the Council of 'Conservative' Citizens (CofCC).
“The governor will be donating this money to charity,” the spokeswoman, AshLee Strong, said in an email.
Holt’s Council of 'Conservative' Citizens propaganda was heavily cited on what seems to be Dylann Roof’s manifesto.
It will surprise no one to discover that Holt donated to the Teabagger Express, among other wingnuts. The teabaggers after all, were known to carry signs suggesting the first black President was an ape, using the n-word, and more. Their racist motivation wasn’t exactly well-disguised.
Lest you have any doubts of their intentions, the CofCC put out a statement after the terrorist attack inspired by their rhetoric that killed nine people, in which they basically said this is wrong, but if things don’t get better for white people, expect more violence:
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CIDr-0xWEAEHyqh.jpg
Council of 'Conservative' Citizens defends Roof's "legitimate grievances"
Of course, mainstream Republicans are being funded by a white nationalist group. This isn’t a surprise. Just read Holt’s online comments and they closely mirror the way Republicans speak about minorities, except Republicans use the Southern strategy of “disguised” racism. Comments written in Holt’s name say that black people were “the laziest, stupidest and most criminally-inclined race in the history of the world.”
Other Republican 2016 candidates who received money from the group are Ted Cruz (R-TX), Rand Paul (R-KY), Rick Santorum (R-PA). And Mitt Romney received money in from them in 2012.
Campaigns are supposed to check out groups who donate, but most pocket the cash without looking sideways, so it’s not clear that Republicans knew they were taking money from a racist hate group. In fact, Republicans are falling over themselves to return the money now.
But the real question is why did his racist hate group want them in office so much that they donated $65,000 to Republicans?

Fox News Gets Desperate and Calls The Confederate Flag The Flag Of The Democratic Party

fox-news-racist
In a desperate attempt to hide their role in pushing the GOP’s racist rhetoric, Fox News is claiming that the Confederate flag is the flag of the Democratic Party.
Fox News hack Andrea Tantaros said, “You know what baffles the mind? This isn’t a Republican flag. Historically this was the flag of southern Democrats, remember that, fact? I find this flag offensive. This flag represents the fight in slavery, and it was a flag that the southern Democrats — Democrats — used to fly against Northern Republicans so I’m not sure why Republicans are getting peppered over this.”
Tantaros brought up an old time favorite misleading statement by the right. Southerners did support the Democratic Party, but what Fox News likes to leave out is that racist ideological strain left the Democratic Party and moved over to the Republicans during the Civil Rights movement.
It is ridiculous for anyone to claim that the Confederate flag is the flag of the party that is led by the nation’s first African-American president. It is even more absurd for Fox News to ignore the fact that it was Republicans who supported flying the Confederate flag over the state capitol.
Republicans are getting hammered for this because they are the party that pushed for the Confederate flag as a symbol of “Southern heritage.” The Confederate flag is not a Republican flag or a Democratic flag. It is a Naval Jack that bigoted morons perverted into a symbol of slavery, racism and hate.
There is only one political party in the United States that has been using racism to scare and divide the country, and that is the Republican Party.
Fox News is getting desperate and pulling out all of the stops to spin away the right’s trafficking in racial politics. Fox is even out of step with Republicans like South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley, who is set to call for the flag to be taken down.
The years of Fox News supported racial hate are coming back to bite Republicans and their cable news network. Fox News embraced the racial dog whistles, so now they own the ugly symbolism of the Confederate flag.

Wingnuts On Twitter Outraged After Wingnut Haley Calls For Removal Of Confederate Flag

Righties On Twitter Outraged After Gov. Haley Calls For Removal Of Confederate Flag (IMAGES) The racist motive behind the murders of nine people in Charleston, South Carolina, has caused a renewed call to remove the Confederate flag from the grounds...
Don't you just love it when the wingnuts eat their own!

Asinine Fox And Friends Publicity Stunt Nearly Kills A Man On Live TV

The idiots at Fox really don't need to continue to prove what idiots they are - we know
Featured image credit: video screen capture, courtesy of News Funnies on youtubeHe threw the axe. He missed the target. He hit the man that was standing directly behind it. We’ve seen a lot of stupid from Fox, but this fiasco is just beyond words.

Wingnut Heads Exploding Over Photo Published Of Ted Cruz At Gun Range

Right Wing Heads Exploding Over Photo Published Of Ted Cruz At Gun Range
Why? You'd think all the lunatic fringe gun nuts would be whooping it up.

Tylenol Has A New Ad Campaign: Wingnut Meltdown in 3…2…1…

Tylenol Has A New  Ad Campaign: Right-Wing Meltdown in 3…2…1… (VIDEO)Johnson and Johnson is unveiling a new ad campaign for Tylenol. And, boy, are the wingnuts going to hate it!

Thursday, June 25, 2015

The Daily Drift

Breaking News: Wingnut heads are exploding all over the place as we speak because SCOTUS did the correct thing this morning and upheld The Affordable Care Act's subsidy provision(s). The loud sonic boom you heard was the bubble bursting in wingnutistan as the ruling was announced.
Hey, wingnuts, yeah we're talking to you ...!  
 
The Truth Be Told is read in 204 countries around the world.
 
Typical Republican thinks catfishing is posting a phony profile on-line in hopes of stringing some poor slob along promising sex but not delivering - something they do regularly  ... !
Today is - National Catfish Day
 
Don't forget to visit our sister blog Carolina Naturally

Some of our readers today have been in:
The Americas
Argentina - Brazil - Canada - Colombia - Costa Rica - Mexico - Nicaragua - Panama - Puerto Rico 
United States - Venezuela
Europe
Albania - Belarus - Bosnia/Herzegovina - Bulgaria - Croatia - Czech Republic - England - France 
Germany - Greece - Iceland - Ireland - Italy - Netherlands - Norway - Poland - Portugal - Russia
Scotland - Serbia - Slovenia - Spain - Ukraine - Wales
Asia
Burma - China - India - Indonesia - Korea - Malaysia - Pakistan - Sri Lanka
Africa
Algeria - Kenya - Morocco - South Africa - Zambia
The Pacific
Australia - Philippines - Polynesia

It’s Not War Crimes, But shrub junta Officials Can Be Sued For Post 9/11 Violations

Bush3
For even semi-intelligent Americans, various actions by the shrub junta after the terror attacks on 9/11 were either war crimes or at the very least unconstitutional. Whether it was illegally spying on American citizens, or rounding up “suspected terrorists” based solely on their country of origin, perceived faith (Islam), or suspected racial makeup, the shrub junta likely violated the Constitution in several ways. Although the actions in America by the shrub junta do not qualify as war crimes, they were certainly constitutional violations that must be addressed and rectified. Now, according to a recent ruling by the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals shrub junta officials did take part in “grave constitutional violations” after the 9/11 terror attacks. The Appellate Court revived a ‘long-runninglawsuit against the shrub junta brought by mostly muslim immigrants who were rounded up as terrorists, subjected to months of beatings, humiliating searches, and a wide range of other prisoner abuses at a detention center on American soil.
The case that finally made it to the 2nd Circuit Court, Turkmen v. Ashcroft, was originally filed as a class action in 2002 at a time it was dangerously daring to challenge the shrub's policies that swept up hundreds of predominately muslim men after the September 11 terror attacks. Instead of targeting the shrub White House, which likely would have garnered a visit from a black ops hit team, the plaintiff’s lawyers only cited former attorney general John Ashcroft and former F.B.I. director Robert S. Mueller III as defendants. Filing a lawsuit against the shrub or his White House in 2002 would have been an insanely foolish, and likely deadly, move.
There was a similar case in 2009 to the one the 2nd Circuit just decided, Ashcroft v. Iqbal, where the Supreme Court ruled another wrongly-detained man was prohibited from suing Ashcroft and Mueller III. The High Court claimed that Mr. Iqbal had failed to supply enough detail about what Ashcroft and Mueller did wrong in rounding him up as a terrorist, but according to the 2nd Circuit’s ruling this past week, “the plaintiffs cleared that (legal) hurdle.”
In writing a joint opinion for the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals, Judges Rosemary S. Pooler and Richard C. Wesley said that the eight plaintiffs, who are either Arab or South Asian immigrants, were unjustly detained, tortured, and generally abused because  the shrub junta’s policies after 9/11 informed them that Muslim immigrants were terrorists. If the shrub junta did not determine the brown-skinned immigrants were already Al Qaeda terrorists, they did claim they were ‘suspected terrorists’ based on their “perceived faith or race” according to the 2nd Circuit.
The eight men were arrested under orders from the shrub junta under the guise of committing the most heinous and deadly of all  immigration violations; working without legal authorization or overstaying a visa after the shrub family’s Saudi Arabian friends committed unspeakable acts of terror on 9/11. The truth is that the men were arrested and seized (according to the 4th Amendment) because they were “suspected of being muslims,” not because of petty immigration violations and the 2nd Circuit’s judges were perfectly capable of working that out of their own accord.  The eight men were detained by the shrub junta for being “suspected terrorists” and sequestered in jail between three to eight months in New York and New Jersey, abused by prison guards, and placed in solitary confinement for extended periods of time.
In fact, according to the 2nd Circuit ruling, “The suffering endured by those who were imprisoned merely because they were caught up in the hysteria of the days immediately following 9/11 is not without a remedy. Holding individuals in solitary confinement 23 hours a day with regular strip-searches because their perceived faith or race placed them in the group targeted for recruitment by Al Qaeda violated the detainees’ constitutional rights.” Further, the judges wrote, “We simply cannot conclude at this stage that concern for the safety of our nation justified the violation of the constitutional rights on which this nation was built. The question at this stage of the litigation is whether the eight foreigners arrested on immigration charges have plausibly pleaded that the (shrub) government officials exceeded the bounds of the Constitution in the wake of 9/11. We believe that they have. The Constitution defines the limits of the Defendants’ (shrub junta’s) authority. Detaining individuals as if they were terrorists, in the most restrictive conditions of confinement available, simply because these individuals were, or appeared to be, Arab or Muslim exceeds those limits.”
In what has to be the most bizarre, most absurd, and most typically neo-con thinking possible, particularly for a Circuit Court judge, Reena Raggi wrote in a 91-page dissenting opinion that no court was fit to decide if the eight men were illegally detained or if the shrub junta violated the Constitution in seizing, torturing, and holding them captive without due process. Judge Raggi, a 2002 shrub appointee, said that deciding what is and is not constitutional is the sworn duty of the United States government’s legislative branch, not the judicial branch. It leads one to ponder why the shrub appointed this person who is without a rudimentary comprehension of the Constitution or what the separate branches of government’s specific duties are. According to the Constitution Judge Raggi swore to uphold, it is the judiciary that determines what is constitutional; Congress makes laws. However, lacking that fundamental knowledge Raggi foolishly wrote in her dissent that “Congress, not the judiciary, is the appropriate branch to decide whether the detained aliens should be allowed to sue executive policymakers in their individual capacities.”
It is a simple task to fathom why the shrub appointed Raggi to the 2nd Circuit Court. In typical shrub fashion she railed on the “majority” opinion and said they made a serious error in daring allow a lawsuit against “the nation’s two highest-ranking law enforcement officials for executing (shrub) policies propounded to safeguard the nation in the immediate aftermath of the infamous Al Qaeda terrorist attacks.” One gets the true neo-con thinking in Raggi’s statement that arresting, detaining, and abusing eight men because they were perceived as muslims was a public good and display of tolerance. Seriously, she actually said that “it is difficult to imagine a public good more demanding of decisiveness or more tolerant of reasonable judgments than the protection of this nation and its people from further terrorist attacks.” Only in neo-con world is the idea of imprisoning and abusing eight human beings living in America for appearing muslim that made them “suspected terrorists” considered “a public good” or a remotely “reasonable judgment” regardless the reason or who in the shrub White House issued the executive order.
After thirteen years, the eight plaintiff’s lawyer said the ruling sent a powerful message. A lawyer with the Center for Constitutional Rights, Rachel Meeropol concurred with the plaintiff’s lawyer and held out hope there will be more defendants going forward. Ms. Meeropol opined that, “although punishing low-level perpetrators is necessary, it is hardly sufficient to prevent future abuse. Orders came from officials at the highest levels of government. Now we have the chance to ensure that they are held accountable and not treated as if they are above the law.”
However well-intentioned Meeropol’s assertion, high level shrub junta officials are above the law or they would be sitting in the Hague awaiting trial or waiting to see which prison they would be spending the rest of their pathetic war criminal lives in. However, they are above the law and free because here in America the rule of law is not applicable to Republican war criminals. Why? Because it is more crucial for Democrats to “look forward” and “not backwards” at seven-and-a-half years of a Republican junta that regularly violated the Geneva Convention and the United States Constitution.
However, it appears that now, thanks in great part to the long-suffering and perseverance of eight men the shrub’s junta perceived were muslim  and therefore terrorists, and a decision by the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals, at least two of the shrub criminals will face their accusers in a court of law. Sadly the shrub duo is not being sued for war crimes, but for violating the U.S. Constitution that they do not believe applies to a Republican junta.

Trickle down economics is wrong, says IMF

Adding another nail to the coffin of Reaganomics, a recent study published by the International Monetary Fund (IMF) has concluded that, contrary to the principles of “trickle-down” economics, an increase in the income share of the wealthiest people actually leads to a decrease in GDP growth.“The benefits do not trickle down,” the authors of the study write, directly contradicting the theory that US pretender Ronald Reagan popularized in the 1980s. Reagan argued that decreasing the tax burden for the rich–investors, executives, corporations and the like–would not only increase their own income but stimulate broad economic growth as they create opportunities for others’ increased prosperity. This belief has been at the center of conservative economic thought in the United States and abroad since Reagan’s presidency, during which he cut tax rates for the rich.
But the IMF study’s five authors say we should instead focus on raising the income of the poor and the middle class. “Widening income inequality is the defining challenge of our time,” they write. “In advanced economies, the gap between the rich and poor is at its highest level in decades."

The Republican Clown Car as Indecipherable Strategy

54d8ceff834a6_-_esq-republican-clowns-120811-ah2d8u-xlg
I’m beginning to think the Republican Clown Car of Candidates is a deliberate campaign strategy that is somehow beyond the comprehension of most regular-thinking mortals. The upcoming 2016 Presidential Election being the third in a row where the vast majority of Republican candidates were gleefully unhinged, unqualified, unintelligent, or in some other way completely and totally unbelievable, I have to wonder whether this is one of those slight-of-hand type tricks where we’re seduced into looking at what’s going on over here, when what’s really about to stomp us into the dirt is coming at us from way over here.
 If you don’t believe me, or think I’m venturing too far down the conspiracy theory trail, then let’s take a look at the roster, shall we? This is not a full list of all the Republican candidates from years past, and I will freely confess that there were even a few reasonable candidates in there (2012 candidates Buddy Roemer and Jon Huntsman both come to mind, neither of whom stood a chance due to such intolerable character defects as sanity, decency, etc.) but the list of names to follow should, at the very least, cause you to go hmmmmm…

2008
Final Four
Nominee: John McCain (accompanied by Sarah Palin)
Mike Huckabee (dog told him to run)
Mitt Romney (money told him to run)
Ron Paul (great entertainment value)

Honorable Mention (who dropped out before or during the primaries)
Rudy Giuliani
Alan Keyes (because Obama)
Fred Thompson (played same character in life as on screen)

2012

Final Two
Nominee: Mitt Romney
Ron Paul

Honorable Mention
Newt Gingrich (good at sounding smart)
Michele Bachman (scary fun)
Rick Santorum
Rick Perry (what’s wrong with Texas, Exhibit A)
Herman Cain (more great entertainment)

2016:

Declared
Jeb Bush (related to two earlier mistakes)
Donald Trump
Ben Carson (good at medicine)
Ted Cruz (Dr. Smooth)
Carly Fiorina (because Hillary)
Lindsey Graham
Mike Huckabee (again)
Rand Paul (Son of Ron)
Rick Perry (again)
Rick Santorum (again)
Marco Rubio (really good at sweating)

In the Wings
Bobby Jindal (whatever)
Chris Christie (whatever again)
Scott Walker (same)
Even if they all became Koch addicts, it’s difficult to see how most of these jokers ever imagined themselves in the White House, or any house that serves solid food or offers a room with an actual view not framed by padded walls. Jeb Bush was supposed to be the moderate Republican candidate for 2016, or so I thought until he started spouting such teabagger crowd-pleasers as suggesting the public shaming of single mothers. Mitt Romney was supposed to be the (somewhat) reasonable and realistic Republican candidate of 2012, except that no one liked him and he couldn’t stop running away from himself screaming every time he confronted a mirror. John McCain in 2008, once again the same thing, until he let Palin on board and it was full speed ahead to Wacky World.
Now here comes the recently announced Donald Trump on his widdle tricycle, tooting his widdle horn, the Clown Prince Triumphant. Seriously?
For a political party so obsessed with the evils of overspending to be spending this much money on this many idiots, time after time, has just got to be part of some grand design.
Doesn’t it…?

How Republicans Turned Running For Pretender Into A Giant Money Making Scam

How Republicans Turned Running For President Into A Giant Money Making Scam (VIDEO)
Who needs a real job when you can be a professional pretender candidate?

... And They'll Prove It

Fox News Freaks Out That POTUS Used The Same Word The Republican Cabal Calls Him

Fox News Freaks Out That POTUS Used The Same Word The GOP Calls Him
On Friday's WTF Podcast with Marc Maron, President Obama uses the N word, Fox News loses their minds

The Charleston Massacre: 'While Republican Cabal Candidates Stammer, Clinton Confronts Race'

The Charleston Massacre: 'While GOP Candidates Stammer, Clinton Confronts Race'
According to Gearan, "Clinton plans to discuss the Charleston shootings Tuesday afternoon during a community meeting at a predominantly black cult in Florissant, Mo., near Ferguson, site of last summer's searing race riots."

MSNBC's Alex Witt Calls BS When Ron Christie Says Too Soon To Talk Guns

Finally! MSNBC's Alex Witt Calls BS When Ron Christie Says Too Soon To Talk Guns
After a years-long pattern of mass shootings followed by conservatives who always say that it's too soon after the tragedy to talk about gun control, MSNBC Alex Witt finally hit her breaking point on Saturday.

Black Cults In Arizona Say ‘No Thanks’ To ‘Protection’ From Arpaio’s Posses: He Ignores Them

Black Churches In Arizona Say ‘No Thanks’ To ‘Protection’ From Arpaio’s Posses: He Ignores ThemRacist Arizona Sheriff Joe Arpaio is sending his racist posses to black cults in Maricopa County. Whether they want them or not.

Fox News Is Now Trying To Blame Cultural Diversity For Gun Violence

Fox News Is Now Trying To Blame Cultural Diversity For Gun Violence (VIDEO)
Fox News supports a white supremacist narrative.

Follow The Money: Tracing The Immoral Disgusting Greed Of The NRA

It's way past time that Americans stop being bullied by the disgusting, immoral greed of the NRA and that members know this is not the old NRA.…
pray you can put away the guns
After an NRA leader predictably blamed the Charleston victims for their own deaths based on a faulty premise and an inaccurate understanding of the legislative process, you might be wondering why the NRA says such tone-deaf, ignorant things after each mass shooting.
It’s because they have a lot of money at stake and they need to find a way to keep lax gun regulations from being blamed for the shameful level of gun violence in the United States. They can’t make that argument logically, so they throw rhetorical bombs at people who were just murdered and at their families and friends.
Lot’s of people think of the National Rifle Association of America of yesterday — back before it was a corporate whore killing innocents for profit. But it has evolved from the independent group it used to be into a monster of corporate greed.
Since 2005, the gun industry and its corporate allies have given between $20 million and $52.6 million to it through the NRA Ring of Freedom sponsor program. Donors include firearm companies like Midway USA, Springfield Armory Inc, Pierce Bullet Seal Target Systems, and Beretta USA Corporation. Other supporters from the gun industry include Cabala’s, Sturm Rugar & Co, and Smith & Wesson.
The NRA also made $20.9 million — about 10 percent of its revenue — from selling advertising to industry companies marketing products in its many publications in 2010, according to the IRS Form 990.
Additionally, some companies donate portions of sales directly to the NRA. Crimson Trace, which makes laser sights, donates 10 percent of each sale to the NRA. Taurus buys an NRA membership for everyone who buys one of their guns. Sturm Rugar gives $1 to the NRA for each gun sold, which amounts to millions. The NRA’s revenues are intrinsically linked to the success of the gun business.
The NRA is no longer a group of gun enthusiasts advocating for gun rights. Now they fight viciously to bar universal background checks while then using the fact that killers get weapons they would not have this way to fearmonger people into carrying more guns.
Remember this? “We need to have every single school in America immediately deploy a protection program proven to work — and by that I mean armed security.” That was the NRA’s Wayne LaPierre just one week after 26 people, including 20 children, were mass murdered in Sandy Hook Elementary School.
All they are really saying each time they open their malevolent, greedy mouths is GIVE US MORE MONEY. WE DON’T CARE WHO DIES. PAY US.
The NRA is why legislation to require universal background checks failed to go anywhere in Congress, in spite of the fact that it had massive public support.
As Secretary Hillary Clinton said at a U.S. Conference of Mayors (USCM) 83rd Annual Meeting Saturday, “It makes no sense that we wouldn’t come together to keep guns out of the hands of domestic abusers, or people suffering from mental illnesses, even people on the terrorist watch list. That doesn’t make sense, and it is a rebuke to this nation we love and care about.”
It’s way past time that Americans stop being bullied by the disgusting, immoral greed of the NRA and that members know this is not the old NRA. This isn’t the independent group you joined. The NRA is a festering corporate monster feeding off of the relentless murders of innocents.
Responsible gun owners must reject the irresponsible, sick agenda of the NRA.

Republicans Reeling: White House Candidates And Congressmen Took Cash From White Supremacists

Rand Paul, Ted CruzThe Republican Cabal is being rocked by the news that three pretender candidates and several members of Congress took campaign donations from white supremacist cabal referenced by Charleston shooter Dylann Roof in his manifesto.
The Guardian reported on the donations that Earl Holt, the president of the Council of 'Conservative' Citizens made to Republicans:
Holt has since 2012 contributed $8,500 to Cruz, the Texas senator running for the Republican pretender nomination, and his Jobs, Growth and Freedom Fund political action committee, according to Federal Election Commission (FEC) filings. On some filings Holt’s occupation was listed as “slumlord”. He has also given $1,750 to RandPAC, the political action committee of Paul, the Kentucky senator and presidential contender, and he gave $2,000 to the 2012 presidential campaign of Mitt Romney.vA further $1,500 was donated by Holt to Santorum, the former Pennsylvania senator and 2012 Republican pretender primary runner-up, who is running for president again in the 2016 race and attended Sunday’s memorial service at Emanuel AME Cult.
….
Holt has also distributed tens of thousands in campaign contributions among prominent Republicans in Congress, such as Steve King of Iowa ($2,000), Tom Cotton of Arkansas ($1,500) and Jeff Flake of Arizona ($1,000). He also gave $3,200 to the former Minnesota congresswoman and pretender candidate Michele Bachmann.
The Republican pretender candidates rushed to refund the donations, but their refunds can’t hide the larger point.
The hate speech and anti-immigrant policies of the Republican Cabal are appealing to racists. Steve King is a flaming racist who regularly demonizes immigrants. Tom Cotton has also engaged in the anti-immigrant rhetoric while calling for military action against muslims in the Middle East.
Attention will focus on the donations to Republican pretender candidates, but this is a party wide issue. Republicans have spent years trying to divide the country along racial lines, and the racist chickens are coming home to roost.
Racists hear the Republican dog whistles loud and clear when it comes to President Obama and other minorities. The Republican Cabal is the anti-minority cabal. Republicans oppose equality and citizenship women, Hispanics, gays, and African-Americans. This platform has not only made it virtually impossible for Republicans to win the White House. It has also turned the Republican Cabal into the cabal of racist hate.

The Cockroaches Scatter: Ted Cruz Can’t Give Back Wingnut Cabal’s Money Fast Enough

The Council of 'Conservative' Citizens says blacks are "the laziest, stupidest and most criminally-inclined race in the history of the world"…

No Matter How Hard They Try, Republicans Can’t Prove That Repealing Obamacare Saves Money

Even Republican Cabal-endorsed math still finds that getting rid of Obamacare would add billions to the federal budget.

Four Giant Problems With The Supreme Court Case Against Obamacare


The trouble with saying untrue things to the Supreme Court is that you can get caught.

House Republicans Propose Stripping Family Planning Services From Millions Of Low-Income Women

House Republicans released a budget proposal this week that would eliminate funding for the Title X program, a decades-old network of family planning providers offering birth control, cancer screenings, STD testing, and reproductive health treatment to millions of low-income women across the country.
The Title X program was first created in 1970 under former President Richard Nixon. Back then, federally-funded family planning services had broad bipartisan support on Capitol Hill, as lawmakers on both sides of the aisle acknowledged the government’s role in making birth control more accessible to impoverished Americans. “It is my view that no American woman should be denied access to family planning assistance because of her economic condition,” Nixon declared at the time.
Since then, the GOP position has shifted considerably. Spurred by concerns that some Title X providers — like Planned Parenthood — also function as abortion clinics, conservative lawmakers have set their sights on stripping funding from the federal program. In 2011, House Republicans voted along party lines to dismantle Title X.
These legislative attacks on the family planning program have so far been rebuffed by a Democratic-controlled Senate. However, now that Republicans control the Senate, it’s possible that Congress’ final budget could include the elimination of Title X this year.
The proposal from the House Appropriations Committee also seeks to roll back much of the Affordable Care Act, eliminate most of the federal funding for comprehensive sex ed and teen pregnancy prevention programs, and give employers more power to refuse to cover reproductive health care services they object to. The committee is holding a hearing on the proposal on Wednesday morning

Top Ten Rotten Fruits Of The Wingnut ‘Christian’ Spirit

Featured image credit: Jacob Esben H. via flckr, creative commons license 2.0From ignorance to fear, hate and violence, here’s a list of the top ten rotten fruits of the wingnut 'christian' spirit.

Court Forces Poor Disabled Woman To Pay 3 Times Her Student Loan Amount

Court Forces Poor Disabled Woman To Pay 3 Times Her Student Loan Amount
It’s such a scam that people should start life in debt and remain there for the rest of their lives.

Bad Cops

Wednesday, June 24, 2015

The Daily Drift

Hey, wingnuts, yeah we're talking to you ...!  
 
The Truth Be Told is read in 203 countries around the world.
 
Typical Republican fairy (they just won't admit it until they're caught) ... !
Today is - International Fairy Day
 
Don't forget to visit our sister blog Carolina Naturally

Some of our readers today have been in:
The Americas
Argentina - Brazil - Canada - Costa Rica - Panama - Peru - Puerto Rico - Sint Eustatius/Saba 
United States - Venezuela
Europe
Belarus - Bosnia/Herzegovina - Bulgaria - Czech Republic - England - France - Germany - Greece - Ireland Italy - Lithuania - Mexico - Netherlands - Norway - Poland - Portugal - Romania - Russia - Scotland  Slovakia - Slovenia - Spain - Ukraine - Wales
Asia
Bangladesh - China - India - Indonesia - Japan - Korea - Malaysia - Mauritius -  Pakistan 
Sri Lanka - Thailand
Africa
Kenya - Morocco - Nigeria - South Africa - South Sudan
The Pacific
Australia - Philippines

It’s Not Just Climate — Pope Francis Is Also Warning About The Health Of Our Oceans

Pope Francis is making headlines for recognizing the threat of climate change. But his encyclical also called attention to the world's oceans.

Bernie Sanders Draws More Supporters Than Every Republican Candidate as 4,500 Fill Rally

sanders-supreme-court
Bernie Sanders drew a bigger crowd than any Republican candidate, as 4,500 supporters filled his event in Denver.
According to the Sanders campaign:
Thousands of cheering and chanting Coloradans – one of the biggest crowds for any presidential candidate so far this campaign – showed up here on Saturday night to hear Bernie Sanders tell them they were sending a message to the billionaire class that “‘You can’t have it all. This is our country too.'”

….

By the university’s count, 4,500 people were in the gym, atrium and lacrosse field to see Sanders, the candidate for the Democratic Party presidential nomination and a U.S. senator from Vermont.

When the crowd chanted his name, Bernie stopped them. “This campaign is not about me,” he said. “It is not about Hillary Clinton or any other candidate,” he added. “This campaign is about you, your kids and your parents. It is about creating a political movement of millions of people who stand up and loudly proclaim that this nation belongs to all of us and not just a handful of billionaires.”
Sen. Sanders drew the second biggest crowd of the entire campaign in Denver. The only bigger crowd by official count was Hillary Clinton’s rally in New York last weekend. Sen. Sanders is pulling off the most impressive feat of the campaign. People are excited and showing up for his events.
Unlike Ted Cruz who drew a big crowd for his campaign launch by holding it a university event that students were forced to attend, the enthusiasm for Bernie Sanders is real. He doesn’t pay actors to come to his rallies and support him like Donald Trump did. His supporters are excited about their candidate.
The media and Republicans drone on about the depth of the Republican field, but early on in 2016, one trend continues for Democrats. Democratic candidates have the enthusiastic supporters. Republican candidates didn’t draw large crowds in 2008 or 2012, and the lack of GOP grassroots support is continuing in 2016.
Bernie Sanders are outdrawing Republican all across the country, and this is a good sign for the Democratic Party as the nation gears up to elect a new president.

Bernie Sanders Takes Down Trump and Takes Back Neil Young’s Song From The Billionaire Thief

neil-young-2
Bernie Sanders took down Donald Trump and took back Rockin’ In The Free World by using the song with Neil Young’s permission at his rally in Denver.
In a statement about the Denver rally, the Sanders campaign not so subtlety noted, “This is an extraordinary turnout,” Sanders said as he surveyed the crowd after climbing onto the Hamilton Gymnasium stage at the University of Denver. Neil Young’s “Rockin’ in the Free World” played (with the singer/songwriter manager’s approval) as Sanders was introduced to the standing-room-only crowd that spilled into an atrium and a nearby lacrosse field outside.”
Donald Trump stole Neil Young’s Rockin’ In The Free World by using at his presidential campaign announcement without the artist’s permission. Young responded by making it abundantly clear that Trump did not have permission to use his song, and that he supports Bernie Sanders. Trump responded by claiming that he had paid for permission to use the song, and basically called Neil Young a liar, but he also said that he would not be using the song again.
Bernie Sanders not only took down Trump by using the song. He also took the song back from the billionaire who tried to steal it. Rockin’ In The Free World is a criticism of Republican policies, and the lyrics fit much better with Bernie Sanders than they ever would with any Republican.
Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders are complete opposites. Bernie Sanders is running a campaign that is about giving voice and power back to the people. Trump is running because he is, “really, really rich.” Bernie Sanders is generating overflow crowds for each of his rallies. Donald Trump had to pay actors to come to his rally and cheer for him. Bernie Sanders is a serious public servant who has spent decades fighting for ordinary Americans. Donald Trump is a reality TV buffoon who is most famous for saying “You’re fired.”
Sen. Sanders is fighting to lead a revolution against the billionaire takeover of the electoral system and government, and the Donald Trumps of the world are exactly what Sanders is running against. The theft of Neil Young’s song was symptomatic of the idea that the wealthiest Americans can take whatever they want, but Bernie Sanders is leading the popular charge to take the country back.

Working Women Spell Doom For Republican Chances Of Retaking The White House In 2016

If Republicans continue to ignore working women, and Hillary Clinton becomes the 2016 Democratic nominee, the Republican Cabal will be in world of hurt.…
women vote women work
A June 19th piece in The Washington Postwritten by Danielle Paquette, discusses a major problem for the Republican Cabal in the 2016 pretender race. The party does not appeal to working women. Paquette interviewed a number of Republican agitators who expressed concern that the Republican pretender candidates were doing next to nothing to encourage women who work outside the home to vote for them.
Working women have been abandoning the Republican Party in droves. For example, in 2004, the shrub managed to get nearly half the vote from working moms in the U.S. electorate. Four years later, John McCain was only able to secure 40 percent of the working mom vote. In 2012, Republican Cabal nominee Mitt Romney, who embodied an old-fashioned view of sex roles and family structure, struggled to get just a third of the vote from working mothers.
Despite the Republican’s failure to appeal to working women, the conservative executive director of the Independent Women’s Forum, Sabrina Schaeffer, argues that Republicans are still providing no answers. She laments:
For years now, Democrats have been saying: We are focused on women in the workplace. For whatever reason, Republicans keep ignoring these issues. It’s the absolute worst thing they can do. They need to understand, engage and offer better solutions.
John McCain’s 2008 political adviser Douglas Holtz-Eakin also argues that his party has become out of touch with the concerns of working women. He notes:
Every parent who works has been through the day-care nightmare. This has been under-appreciated by Republican candidates in part and conservatives in general.
Yet despite the burgeoning costs of child care and the fact that the United States offers precious little in the way of paid family leave for working mothers, the Republican pretender candidates remain silent on some of the issues that matter most to working women. In addition, the Republican Cabal’s assault on reproductive rights, their attacks on health care subsidies, their byzantine views on female contraception, and their opposition to equal pay for equal work, are all turn offs to many professional women.
The Republicans have been hemorrhaging support from working women for a decade. That problem is only going to be compounded if the Republican Cabal has to present their outdated views on the same stage with Hillary Clinton, who has made the concerns of working women one of the cornerstones of her campaign. Working women helped propel Barack Obama to two victories over Republican Cabal candidates in 2008 and 2012.
If Republicans continue to ignore working women in 2016, and Hillary Clinton becomes the Democratic nominee, the Republican Cabal will be in world of hurt politically.

JFK on Republicans

Fox News Hack Doesn’t Want President Obama Protected By Secret Service

Fox News Host Doesn’t Want President Obama Protected By Secret Service (VIDEO)
This is deplorable…
Read more 

Would your 'imaginary friend' jesus approve of your anti-immigrant rants?

D.C. cardinal destroys Rush Limbaugh with a smile

The Archbishop of Washington Cardinal Donald Wuerl speaks to Fox News (screen grab)
“This is one of the great blessings of America,” Wuerl replied with a smile. “We’re all allowed to speak our mind even if we don’t have all the facts, even if we don’t have a clear view of what the other person is saying. We’re all allowed to speak our mind, and that’s what he’s doing.”

How The 2016 Republican Candidates Would Deal With Millions Of Americans Losing Their Health Plans


Two Sides To A Story

The Rest Of The World Thinks Americans Should Be Ashamed

The Charleston massacre surprised some around the world who thought an African American President meant the nation's days of racism were history…
shame
Reputation is the general opinion that people have about someone or something, and although Americans have a very high opinion of themselves, and this country, that is simply not the case around the world. Even setting aside the event in Charleston this week, it is easy to understand why, like a few astute Americans, people around the world do not have a very high opinion of a nation they rightly describe as structurally violent and racist.
If there is only one thing the world has learned about Americans, it is that besides being inordinately racist, they typically resort to violence to achieve their goals at home and abroad. That being the case, there is nothing un-American about the Confederate racist who gunned down nine innocent African Americans in a place they considered a sanctuary; their church. Violence, particularly gun violence, against people of color and to solve differences is explicitly American, and as the world sees it, shameful.
Whether Americans believe it or not, people from around the world and outside of America’s immediate sphere of influence get a very accurate picture of this country because they are not fed by America’s corporate conservative media. The latest race-driven attack on a specific group of people was not so much a shock to other nations, although it was shockingly brutal to many, but a reminder that Americans as a group are gun-addicted and steeped in racism. In countries that have strict gun laws in place, firearm violence is virtually “unheard of,” and like this author’s colleagues from around the globe, they wonder why, after so many mass shootings, there is a fanatical gun culture panting for more firearm ownership.
Some of the assessments of the sad state of affairs in America, affairs that stain the nation’s reputation, are not only telling about the American people, they show just how backward and savage this country really is. For example, people in China compared the United States to lawless Somalia and cited racial discrimination as fueling the level and frequency of violence. 
Claire Taylor of Gun Free South Africa said, “The USA is completely out of step with the rest of the world. We’ve tightened our gun laws and have seen a reduction.” Taylor is not entirely correct; America may be out of step with civilized societies, but it is completely in step with lawless countries like Somalia, Yemen, Afghanistan, and Iraq where gun proliferation and prejudice have produced a nation that a neighboring country accurately portrayed as a “structurally violent.”
That incredibly astute observation was courtesy of a Mexico City newspaper, La Jornada, that wrote that “the U.S. has become a structurally violent state where force is frequently used domestically and internationally to resolve differences. In this context, the unchecked and even paranoid citizen armament is no coincidence. Such a phenomenon reflects the feeling of extensive sectors about the supposed legitimacy of violent methods.” The paper’s editors mean extensive sectors such as Republicans in Congress, gun fanatics in the racist Confederacy, the white supremacist and militia movement, and much of the nation’s law enforcement community.
The La Jornada observation was particularly prescient in describing Americans’ reliance on the use of force to resolve differences both against other Americans who are not white, and other nations (that are also not white). Even though President Barack Obama changed the nation’s international relations by using diplomacy instead of force to resolve its differences, he is virtually powerless to stop white Americans with guns from killing African Americans due to the prevalence of racial animus in the population. America is structurally violent and if Republican warmongers had their way, it would exude its violence all over the brown people in the Middle East. American racism is not confined to animus toward African Americans, but they are the primary victims of this country’s race-driven bigotry; bigotry that confounds other people around the world.
An attorney in Tokyo, Hiroko Takimoto, said America’s “Racially motivated killings are simply something Japanese as a people cannot understand.” The Charleston killings “devastated” a Tokyo University political science student, Yuka Christine Koshino, who had previously participated in racism awareness campaigns while studying at the University of California at Berkeley. Koshino said “those interactions had given her hope that the situation [in America] was improving. The shootings shocked me.”
Koshino was either shocked because she has not paid attention to the news from America over the past six years, or she was naïve to believe that “racism awareness campaigns” are of any value in a deeply racist nation like America; obviously they hold no value whatsoever. Teaching people that racism exists and how to identify it is not now or ever going to make it disappear. In fact in a country like America ‘racism awareness campaigns’ will only expose the high level of racial animus plaguing the nation; particularly in the former Confederacy, the conservative media, and of course the Republican Party and all its iterations.
The Charleston racially-motivated massacre did surprise some people around the world who, like many Americans, thought an African American President meant the nation’s dark days of naked racism were history. Ahmad Syafi’i Maarif, representing Indonesia’s largest Muslim organization, said the church shooting shocked many. He said, “People all over the world believed that racism had gone from the U.S. when Barack Obama was elected to lead the superpower, twice. But the Charleston shooting has reminded us that in fact, it still remains… and can explode at any time, like a terrorist act by an individual.”
American racism is not necessarily unique, and it is true that other countries, such as Britain do struggle with racism and prejudice against outsiders, but that racism does not result in regularly occurring mass shootings. People around the world rightly acknowledge that the massacres in America are a result of a Constitution that protects the right to keep and bear arms, but not protect people of color’s lives. A Canadian resident said, “Guns are in their constitution. I’m pretty sure no one else has anything similar. I never understand why they think gun violence is going to solve anything.” It is simply because this is America and gun violence is as much a part of the culture as the racism that pervades the former Confederacy.
The Charleston shootings reinforced the opinion of the British people that “America has too many guns and too many racists.” In fact in a British newspaper on the front page the headline read, “America’s shame.” The paper’s editors said that “America seems to have moved backward since Obama’s election” and that the “obscene proliferation of guns only magnifies tragedies like the racially-motivated church shooting.” What the newspaper’s editors obviously fail to understand is that the racism rearing its Confederate head of late never went away although they are correct that the President’s election did incite racists to come out of the closets with their guns locked and loaded looking for a race war.
What the British people, and world community for that matter, fail to comprehend is that Americans have no sense of shame over the increasing frequency of mass and racially-motivated shootings. It is just part of what it means to be American, and exceptional. It is why law enforcement continues shooting unarmed African Americans with veritable impunity and why conservatives are scrambling to explain away the Charleston shooter as ‘disturbed.’
Dylann Roof is not disturbed, he is a typical American gun fanatic and a Confederate racist; a product of his American South upbringing.  Except for a relatively small segment of the population, most Americans think his actions are nothing to be ashamed of no matter what the world thinks because this is America and whatever happens here is exceptional.
***
The thing is most Americans agree with the rest of the world. 
It is the very few loud mouthed ignorant assholes that are tarnishing our image. 
It is long past time with threw those pieces of offal onto the waste dump and filled in the hole and make a golf course over top like we do to other landfills full of shit we don't want or need.