Political Truth.
Whether you like it or not.

Sunday, June 28, 2015

Bernie Sanders: Unlike Hillary Clinton, ‘I’ve Taken On The Big Money Interests.’

bernie sanders morning joe
On MSNBC, Democratic presidential candidate Bernie Sanders strongly contrasted his record with Hillary Clinton’s by saying, “I have taken on every element of the big money interests in this country.”
Bernie Sanders was asked if the big crowds he is drawing can translate into votes. He answered, “I truly absolutely think that they can. Look, what exists in the real world, whether it’s Denver, Minneapolis, New Hampshire, Iowa, or Vermont is very different than the kind of discussions that take place here in Washington where so much of what Congress does is dominated by big money. Look, the average American understands that our middle-class is disappearing. Ninety-nine percent of all new income is going to the top one percent and that we need some fundamental changes in economic and politics so that the government begins working for all of us, not just the billionaire class.”
When Mika Brzezinski pointed out that this is the same thing that Hillary Clinton is saying, Sanders replied, “No, I don’t think it is. And I think if you look at my life’s work, what I’ve been struggling with for the last twenty-five to thirty years, I have taken on every element of the big money interests in this country. Whether it is Wall Street. Whether it is the pharmaceutical industry. Whether it’s the Military Industrial Complex. People can judge Hillary Clinton’s record on their own.”
Sen. Sanders also pointed out that Hillary Clinton has yet to take a position on TPP.
Bernie Sanders didn’t mudsling, but the message was clear. Hillary Clinton is a new convert to the fight against the big money interests, while Sanders has been fighting these forces for decades.
The discussion that Sanders and Clinton are creating within the Democratic Party is important. Democrats are resolving as a party to take on the big money interests in American politics. The question is which candidate do voters trust to lead this fight?
In a discussion of records, Bernie Sanders clearly has the longer record of fighting against the big money interests in our political system. Sen. Sanders is contrasting himself with his opponent’s record, and he has a message to voters. Both candidates may be saying the same things, but only one candidate has spent decades taking up the fight.
Hillary Clinton is more liberal than many give her credit for, but compared to Bernie Sanders she looks like a right-wing conservative, which is why Sen. Sanders could be a thorn in her side all through the Democratic primary campaign.

And I Quote

Scott Walker Is Trying to Mortgage Wisconsin’s Future to Fund his White House Bid

Scott Walker's lack of popularity in Wisconsin is certainly noticeable, but Walker's problem right now is his budget, which Wisconsin Republicans say is looking tailored more for out-of-state…
Scott WalkerScott Walker’s lack of popularity in Wisconsin is certainly noticeable. It seems everybody hates Scott Walker. Granted, I’m in among those “Madison liberals” Republicans despise so much, but you don’t see a lot of bumper stickers around these parts supporting Walker. You do see Obama bumper stickers and even anti-Walker bumper stickers, but nothing that makes you believe somebody might have violated the very laws of nature by voting for Walker. In a way, even the lack of bumper stickers is a damning silence.
A bigger problem for Walker right now, however, might be that his own party doesn’t like him. The New York Times yesterday characterized the situation as a “revolt,” a state of affairs certainly much worse than simple anger or a little grumbling.
Is his “big bold leadership” in trouble already?
The problem right now is his budget, which Wisconsin Republicans say is looking tailored more for out-of-state Republicans like voters in Iowa, than for Wisconsin.
Specifically, they say, some way must be found to pay for repairs to infrastructure – roads and bridges.
To listen to Scott Walker, Wisconsin can have its cake and eat it too, as he said with regards his last budget:
The 2013-2015 Budget allocates more than $6 billion to our transportation infrastructure. This significant investment by the state will make major improvements to our highway system and increase spending on harbor upgrades and freight rail. In addition, there are no gas tax increases, no mileage-registration, no fee increases, and there are no scheduled delays for any highway projects.
For the 2015-2017 budget, it is $7.36 billion he wants to devote to Department of Transportation spending. As is so often the case with Republican rhetoric, it just ain’t so. He can’t do the work without tax increases, fees, or delays.
If the Republicans who run the state can’t raise taxes (e.g. gas tax) or fees (like vehicle registration fees), and Walker says they can’t (And as the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel points out, he is “Armed with the nation’s most powerful veto”), then where does the money for Wissconsin infrastructure come from?
A Milwaukee Journal Sentinel editorial said recently that the “State needs to start thinking creatively about road funding.”
Unless new sources of sustainable revenue are found to pay for maintenance and building, commerce could well choke on the potholes, crumbling pavement and weakened bridges that will become the hallmark of Wisconsin roadways.
Republicans are long practiced at performing sleight of hand and making money disappear into the pockets of the rich, but they can’t make money appear out of thin air. This analysis shows where cuts would be made in lieu of borrowing.
According to Robin Voss (R-Rochester), Speaker of the State Assembly, Walker has declined to have “an adult conversation” about infrastructure. Nor did he endear himself to some Republicans when he cut funding to the University of Wisconsin.
Voss argues on his website:
The state is expected to have a nearly $6 billion deficit in the transportation budget over the next decade and a significant shortfall in the upcoming two-year spending plan. Governor Walker has proposed borrowing $1.3 billion for road projects in the 2015-17 state budget. Assembly Republicans, from the very beginning of the budget process, have said that amount of bonding is too high. This is one of the last issues being ironed out in the budget process and it’s an important one for many reasons. It not only impacts the future funding of our roads, but also the entire fiscal health of our state.
So they talk about borrowing money. Walker wanted to borrow $1.3 billion for the roads. Arnold did that in (or “to”) California. They are still paying for it. I have a conservative friend in California who hates Arnold as much as he hates Hillary, and for better reasons, I’d say.
Doesn’t sound like responsible government to me. What happened to not passing your government debts on to our children?
According to Voss, “it’s much more conservative to spend only what you have, instead of running up the state’s credit card.”
Voss says that’s “irresponsible.” He even underlines it. “You can’t borrow your way to prosperity,” he says.
Ouch, Governor Walker. I think that was directed at you.
But Walker isn’t trying to borrow Wisconsin’s way to prosperity. He is trying to borrow his way into the White House.
Voss points to some problems Walker would probably just as soon pretend don’t’ exist:
If we approved Governor Walker’s proposed transportation budget with $1.3 billion in bonding, the state would have to spend 25 cents of every transportation dollar on debt service instead of using that money to build and fix roads and bridges. Looking at it another way, that is $443 million a year in payments on our road debt, or $8.5 million a week!
Or simply not doing the needed work on roads and bridges? That doesn’t sound very responsible either. Bridges fall down. People die. How is that responsible government?
Yes, Republicans, much as they claim to hate socialism, love the things socialism gives them – like roads and bridges. And no more than Democrats do they want them to collapse.
But there is also the problem of what sorts of projects transportation money is being spent on, like roundabouts (traffic circles) in remote areas, fishing piers (yes, with transportation dollars), decorative bridges (fancy lighting and murals), and Wisconsin’s very own bridge to nowhere.
It’s a conundrum, yes it is, and Kevin Drum at Mother Jones puts it well when he says,
As in so many other states, even Republican legislators are starting to glom onto the fact that if you cut taxes, you’re pretty likely to create a big budget hole. Unfortunately for them, they’re learning that there’s only so far you can go in crapping on the poor to close the hole.
Here’s the problem: Walker is running for president. Raising taxes and preserving his conservative bona fides are incompatible. The Republican legislature knows the role they played in Walker’s success. They are not running for president.
No surprise then they have different goals and incentives. Walker doesn’t care if he sticks it to Wisconsin or to the Republican legislature. He is in this for Scott Walker, not for anyone else. Even the Republicans in the legislature can see this.
He plans on living in a big white house in a little more than a year. The Republican legislators will be stuck here holding onto a big bag of bills and no money to pay them. They may not be thinking of right and wrong here, but they are definitely thinking about their jobs.

Corrupt Scott Walker Gave $124 Million Of Taxpayer Money to His Corporate Donors

One of Scott Walker's creations shortly after being sworn in as Wisconsin's moron released a report that exposed yet another Walker junta scandal involving taxpayer money …
ScottWalker-dummy
It is getting to the point that learning a Republican moron is embroiled in some kind of corruption scandal is so normal that it is easy to regard it as little more than business as usual in Republican state politics. It is unclear which Republican moron is more inclined toward corruption involving campaign money for favors, but it is safe to say that two of the leaders are New Jersey's Chris Christie and Wisconsin's Scott Walker. Walker is particularly suspicious due to being owned by the Koch brothers who have anointed him as their choice to occupy the White House and hand them control of the government in return for buying him the presidency. It is no surprise, then, that late last week one of Scott Walker’s creations shortly after being sworn in as Wisconsin’s moron released a report that exposed yet another Walker junta scandal involving taxpayer money going directly to Walker’s campaign donors.
When Walker took office, one of his first self-appointed tasks was creating the Wisconsin Economic Development Corporation (WEDC) that he touted as a “private-public hybrid” to allow “greater flexibility” in offering free taxpayer money to Walker-friendly corporations that promised to expand in Wisconsin and foster a job-creation bonanza the like the nation has never before seen. As Walker’s self-professed “signature initiative,” the WEDC would be chaired, controlled, administered by none other than moron Scott Walker. He was, after all, the creator of the WEDC and no-one in Wisconsin was better suited to hand out free taxpayer money to corporations in return for campaign donations than a noted Koch acolyte and corrupt Republican like Scott Walker.
In an article in the Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel, revelations exposed how Walker’s junta found what it labeled “creative ways” to give free WEDC money to corporations and ignore legitimate concerns about the abilities of corporations to deliver on promises they had no intention of fulfilling; something Scott Walker was well aware of when he created the WEDC and appointed himself its chairman. Now, some of the dirty details have been revealed with hardly any mention or attention from conservative main stream media. Even corporate media knows not to cross a Koch surrogate like Walker no matter how corrupt he is or how much taxpayer money he steals from Wisconsin residents to give his corporate donors and friends.
In a WEDC report curiously released late Friday, Walker’s corporate welfare project revealed the scandalous $500,000 WEDC loan to Building Committee Inc. (BCI). BCI is a corporation owned by someone who gave moron Scott Walker’s campaign the maximum donation allowed by law; the scandal is that Wisconsin taxpayers saw their $500,000 loan to Walker’s corporate donor never get repaid by design of Walker’s pet project. Before any American, or Wisconsin taxpayer, gets exercised over Walker’s half-a-million dollar corporate welfare gift to a campaign donor, they should know that the WEDC also revealed all of its other records regarding “loans and grants” to corporations without any oversight, review, or accountability except by the WEDC’s chairman and man-in-charge, moron Scott Walker.
The WEDC provided the results of a review of the awards that It made from July 1, 2011, and June 30, 2013, and revealed that 26 separate awards were made without any formal Staff Review; a “Staff Review” is the alleged WEDC accountability mechanism that is supposed to be responsible for underwriting the so-called “job-creating awards.” All the awards took place within the first 15 months of Walker creating the WEDC under the guise of a public-private hybrid to create jobs and foster outrageous economic growth for Wisconsin taxpayers; something that has not occurred. One cannot fathom any state’s agency handing out  26 taxpayer-funded “awards” without some kind of formal review or oversight mechanism in place to protect taxpayer’s investment, but when one realizes it is Scott Walker handing out a whopping $124 million of Wisconsin taxpayer’s money to his corporate donors, corruption and cronyism makes perfect sense. Remember, the Koch brothers believe if government has to exist at all, it is only to take taxpayer dollars and transfer them directly into corporate coffers and in Scott Walker’s Wisconsin, taxpayer money is transferred without review or oversight.
Some of the notable “awards” under Walker’s “guidance” besides the half-a-million to a campaign donor without remuneration were to major Wisconsin corporation as ‘incentives’ to expand operations and create an overabundance of jobs. Corporations such as Spectrum Brands, Kestrel Aircraft Company, Plexus Corporation, and Kohl’s department store that Walker regularly touts as the best “business approach and economic model” to govern the United States. Of the 27 awards without any WEDC oversight except Governor Scott Walker’s, the largest was worth $62.5 million of Wisconsin taxpayer money to Kohl’s Department store. The second largest ‘gift’ went to Kestrel Aircraft to the tune of $18 million and to no-one’s surprise Kestrel has not built one airplane in the 3 ½ years since it got free taxpayer money. Third highest, and likely most offensive to Wisconsin taxpayers, was a $15 million taxpayer gift to the Plexus Corporation that promptly sent 116 Wisconsin residents’ jobs to foreign countries instead of creating them. Walker promised that investing taxpayer dollars in already-profitable corporations would ‘encourage them to expand’ when he announced his signature public-private hybrid initiative to create jobs for Wisconsin residents.
In yet another WEDC scam, Walker attempted to hand out an additional $55 million to corporations and sought to exempt the payouts from open records requirements. Whether it is due to the state’s budget woes or just fear of being ensnared in Walker’s corruption, the state legislature’s Joint Finance Committee put a screeching halt to the “secret” gifts. After the release of the WEDC report last week, it is glaringly obvious why Walker was so anxious to conceal the proposed $55 million gifts from taxpayers to corporations friendly to Scott Walker.
Walker cannot possibly slough off revelations of his blatant corruption and cronyism as a plot by school teachers, public-sector employees, Democrats, or unions to undermine his White House ambitions. WEDC and its unaccountable corporate welfare is Walker’s creation and signature ‘job creation’ initiative, and he was the chairman of the board while $124 million in taxpayer dollars were handed out as gifts to corporations without oversight, accountability, or in Wisconsin parlance “staff reviews.” Walker being in complete control of the WEDC informs why the corporations that received free taxpayer dollars have not even attempted to create jobs or expand operations in Wisconsin and why should they?
Scott Walker’s name is as synonymous with corruption and cronyism as it is with the Koch brothers, and it is beyond comprehension why Wisconsin voters tolerate his criminality or why the Koch puppet is not preparing to spend a decade or two in a federal penitentiary for campaign finance violations. However, this is America and campaign finance laws are so regularly violated by Republicans that it appears even the Federal Elections Commission regards it as business as usual. It is either that, or the FEC has had its budget slashed so viciously by the Koch Congress that it is ill-equipped to pursue someone as well-connected to the Kochs as Scott Walker. What is beyond reason is why Wisconsin residents continue tolerating a corrupt Republican like Scott Walker and it leads one to marvel at the idiocy of Wisconsin voters who obviously love the idea of their Koch surrogate giving away $124 million of their hard-earned tax dollars to his corporate friends and campaign donors.

How long ....

http://l3.yimg.com/bt/api/res/1.2/jvQRui7..It.ZXk6gjcWFw--/YXBwaWQ9eW5ld3M7Zmk9ZmlsbDtoPTM3NTtweW9mZj0wO3E9NzU7dz01MDA-/http://media.zenfs.com/en_us/News/ucomics.com/stah150624.gif

Bill O’Reilly Declares War On ‘Anti-Fox Defamers’ ...

... Or as normal sane people call it ... Telling the truth.

House Votes To Weaken And Delay The EPA’s Climate Rule


The bill would allow governors to refuse to comply with the Environmental Protection Agency's Clean Power Plan.

Study Shows What We Already Knew

Wingnut White People Are The Greatest Terror Threat To America 
Study Shows What We Already Knew: Conservative White People Are The Greatest Terror Threat To America (IMAGES)
Who saw this coming?
Read more 

Take it down ...

http://l.yimg.com/bt/api/res/1.2/kyNm_GGjmW4Hod5Q9DlpSw--/YXBwaWQ9eW5ld3M7Zmk9ZmlsbDtoPTM3MTtpbD1wbGFuZTtweW9mZj0wO3E9NzU7dz01MDA-/http://media.zenfs.com/en_us/News/ucomics.com/crmlu150623.jpg

SCOTUS Upholds ACA Subsidies, 6-3

This great event happened a few of days ago but anytime is the correct time to enjoy the wingnuts' humiliation 
SCOTUS Upholds ACA Subsidies, 6-3

Republicans vow to continue battle against Obamacare despite Supreme Court ruling

And the idiots continue to devolve ...
Republicans vow to continue battle against Obamacare despite Supreme Court ruling

Why It's A Big Deal That The Supreme Court Recognized The Continued Importance Of 'Unconscious' Discrimination

The new Republican flag

The Free Market Is Closing Gay Hating Restaurant And Ted Cruz Is Blaming Liberal Fascism

The Free Market Is Closing Gay Hating Restaurant And Ted Cruz Is Blaming Liberal FascismThe free market is great until wingnuts don’t like the outcome.
***
Oh and FYI there is no thing such as "Liberal Fascism" both terms meanings and ideologies are polar opposites - they cannot be strung together ... except by morons (case in point above).

Judge Nixes 'Kill The Gays' Ballot Initiative

Judge Nixes 'Kill The Gays' Ballot Initiative

If You’re Anti-Gay, You’re Anti-Science

New Study Confirms Kids Of Same-Sex Couples Are Just Fine
If You’re Anti-Gay, You’re Anti-Science: New Study Confirms Kids Of Same-Sex Couples Are Just FinePeople who oppose same-sex parents aren’t just morally repugnant, they’re flat-out anti-science.

Saturday, June 27, 2015

The Daily Drift

Hey, wingnuts, yeah we're talking to you ...!  
 
The Truth Be Told is read in 204 countries around the world.
 
Republicans hate camping - 
Camping involves Nature and we know how much they hate Nature  ... !
Today is - The Great American Backyard Camp Out
 
Don't forget to visit our sister blog Carolina Naturally

Some of our readers today have been in:
The Americas
Argentina - Brazil - Canada - Colombia - Dominican Republic - Mexico - Puerto Rico - United States  Uruguay
Europe
Belgium - Bosnia/Herzegovina - Bulgaria - Czech Republic - Denmark - England - France - Germany  Greece - Iceland - Ireland - Italy - Macedonia - Netherlands - Norway - Poland - Portugal - Romania  Russia - Scotland - Slovenia - Spain - Sweden - Ukraine - Wales
Asia
Azerbaijan - China - India - Indonesia - Malaysia - Mauritius - Pakistan - Saudi Arabia - Sri Lanka
Africa
Libya - Nigeria - South Africa - Tunisia
The Pacific
Australia - Philippines

A Truly Democratic Socialist Place Exists And It’s Wonderful

A Truly Democratic Socialist Place Exists And It’s Wonderful (VIDEO)
People’s needs are taken care of and they are still free. That should piss off conservatives.

North Carolina's Kay Hagan Won't Try To Return To The Senate In 2016

Too bad, she'd be in the Senate in a heartbeat.
North Carolina has had more than enough from their mistakes in the Senate and will correct those mistakes.

Bernie Sanders Confirms Media Bias: The Networks Kept Him Off TV Because He Is A Liberal

sanders-liberal
During an appearance on The Ed Show, Bernie Sanders confirmed that the television networks didn’t want him on their shows because he is a liberal.
On The Ed Show, Sen. Sanders said was asked about if appearing on a lot of television shows was part of his strategy.
The Democratic presidential candidate said, “Well, look Ed, given my politics over the years, it’s been hard for us to get on network television, by the way, and you have been very kind, and I appreciate it, because I’m on your show a lot. But our main strategy is basically going out to the American people. We’ve been having many many town meetings, and you’ve indicated we’ve had extraordinary crowds and enthusiastic turnouts all over this country.”
Sanders also rejected the latest national polling that shows him trailing Hillary Clinton by sixty points, “By the way, we’re not sixty points behind. There’s no question that Hillary Clinton is ahead of us. I think the gap is narrowing. I think that poll is very different from other polls that I have seen. If you look at New Hampshire, if you look at Iowa, the numbers are closer, and we’re gaining momentum.”
It took Bernie Sanders years to get on Meet The Press. Sanders and all other liberals have basically been told that they aren’t welcome on network television. They are rarely invited on the Sunday shows. The Sunday programs would rather have John McCain on for the nine thousandth time to babble about why more Americans have to be sent off to war than give liberals a voice in the nationally televised political discussion.
The only reason that Bernie Sanders is getting on television now is that he is the main Democratic primary opposition to Hillary Clinton. If Sen. Sanders (I-VT) weren’t running for president, the television networks would continue to ignore him.
The truth is that the broadcast networks don’t want to hear from liberals. They are owned by corporations. Corporations sponsor the Sunday morning news programs. They don’t want to give airtime to the political leaders who express the real feelings of ordinary Americans. Bernie Sanders is a threat to the billionaires and corporate oligarchs, and his determination to tell the truth kept him off of network television for years.
With millions rallying behind him, the difference is that the networks can no longer ignore Bernie Sanders.

Our Long National Nightmare Ends

Fox News Dumps Sarah Palin and Deems Her Irrelevant

Donald Trump’s candidacy is ‘already a punchline’

Lewis Black appears at the National Press Club on April 14, 2014.
While his long-standing alienation from presidential politics continues, comedian Lewis Black said, things have gotten to the point where he doesn’t have to “write funny” about the latest batch of wingnut candidates.

Obamacare Keeps Working As Uninsured Rate Keeps Dropping

obamacare-promises
According to the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) the share of working-age adults in America who lack health insurance dropped by more than four percentage points in 2014. That marks the largest percentage drop in the uninsured rate in any year since the CDC first began collecting survey data on uninsured rates in 1997.
The CDC report is based on a health survey of 111,682 American adults. In 2014, roughly 31.7 million people, or 16.3 percent of U.S. adults under age 65 lacked health insurance, compared to 20.4 percent who were uninsured in 2013. Not surprisingly, in states that accepted the federal Medicaid expansion uninsured rates were significantly lower. In Medicaid expansion states the uninsured rate plummeted to 13.3 percent, compared to a 19.3 percent uninsured rate in states that failed to expand Medicaid.
In 2014, Hawaii, the state where President Barack Obama was born, fittingly had the lowest uninsured rate at a mere 2.5 percent. The highest uninsured rates were in Oklahoma and Texas, two states where conservative politicians fiercely resisted Medicaid expansion. Both states had uninsured rates of 21.5 percent.
Ironically 8 of the 10 states that saw the largest drops in uninsured rates were red states in the South and West that did not vote for Barack Obama in 2012. Republicans may not like Obamacare, but Obamacare likes them.
The CDC’s findings come at a time when the Supreme Court is deliberating over whether or not to invalidate federal health care subsidies for 6.4 million Americans who benefit from the expanded affordable coverage made possible by Obamacare. How the court will rule remains a mystery, but there is no mystery about whether or not Obama’s signature health care law is accomplishing the goal of extending health coverage to more Americans. The verdict is in. Obamacare is working.
The CDC’s survey results confirm what other surveys have also verified. Obamacare has reduced the uninsured rate in America significantly. A Gallup Healthways survey released in the first quarter of 2015 has shown that the trend has extended into this year as well. One of the expressed goals of Obamacare was to reduce the percentage of Americans who lacked health insurance because they were unable to afford coverage. On that measure, Obamacare has been an unmistakable success.

Democrats Say They'll Be Ready If Supreme Court Strikes Down Obamacare

***
Of course they were ready - decent people always are - but SCOTUS made the correct decision and there will be no need the move forward on contingency plans

The New Wingnut Plan To Make A Supreme Court Case Gutting Obamacare Even Worse

Wingnut legal cabals, messaging shops, non-think tanks and non-academics are already gearing up to ensure that, should the Supreme Court decide to undercut Obamacare, King v. Burwell will do maximal damage to the nation's economy and to the millions of Americans whose health care is endangered.
***
Of course with the decision by SCOTUS to affirm the legal status of the provisions of the Affordable Care Act makes any plan by wingnuts moot. 

Rise of wingnut hate groups shows we’re still far from being a non-racist society

Bernie Sanders (Screenshot/YouTube)

O’Reilly Explodes During Debate About Race

So, what else is new?
And what would you expect a racist to do - except lie and claim he's not a racist.
And we all know what a liar he is.

South Carolina's Nikki Haley: Flagging Down a Phony!

nikki haleyIn the wake of a senseless, extraordinarily brutal, punk kid execution of nine innocent, spiritual and consummately decent African-Americans in an iconic Charleston AME cult, the Haley-engineered hypocrite express is currently roaring down the nation’s media tracks at full speed.
Yes, South Carolina's Nikki Haley, in her second term of obsessing on legislation that would do the most harm to the poor black population of her state, is now screeching damning condemnation of the South’s last symbolic gasp of racist independence; the Confederate flag.
Visitors to this site have repeatedly read the inhumane Haley directives making it as tough on the South Carolina black population as possible. She even imported political sleazeball, Tony Keck, from the inner sanctum of Bobby Jindal’s Louisiana administration, to assume the head of the South Carolina Health and Human Services Department. This hire made absolutely certain that any health care moves were to the detriment of African-Americans before all others. That goal is now a fait accompli as Keck takes his dog and pony politics to Tennessee.
Haley begs massive, low-paying, few benefits, tax-avoidance corporations to take up residence in her state. The compensation of what jobs are available to blacks wouldn’t feed an average-size dog.
She hates Obama’s health care plan, displaying unbridled enthusiasm for trashing the expansion of Medicaid as called for in the plan. The move impacts the economic status and health outcomes (including death) for millions of Americans. The Kaiser Family Foundation puts the South Carolina number at 178,000, a goodly percentage, black. She’s brought nothing but harm to the minority community.
She’s a big American Legislative Exchange Council member and booster, never hesitating to take ALEC marching orders and corporate-member money in her campaigns and conduct in office. ALEC model legislation is the template for some of the most anti-black legislation on the planet. The Voter ID ALEC legislation being a prime example. Haley signed the bill into law four years ago, accompanied by a celebratory music background. The governor sprinkles every new budget with cuts, some severe, an inordinate number directed at programs benefiting African-Americans. Amazing, considering she’ll help find millions, even billions in incentives for the aforementioned, “pay your employees as little as possible” corporations.
I was in a local Democratic meeting recently when a Democratic legislator informed the crowd that of the hundreds of millions Boeing gets for a 787 Dreamliner manufactured in South Carolina, the state gets $100. People dying for want of a Medicaid expansion, but multi-billion dollar Boeing gets every financial break imaginable. Granted, each new 787 loses a pile of money for Boeing, but that’s a bookkeeping ploy to balance out other huge money makers.
In another huge favor to her giant corporate base, three years ago Haley signed a bill entitled the Carolina Pollution Control Act. It postponed the creation of an isolated wetlands regulatory program and excluded private rights of action against the polluting multi-national monsters under the Act. Sorry, Mr. and Mrs. private citizen. Paraphrasing the Seinfeld Soup Nazi, “No suits for you.”
Speaking of money, nobody benefits more from unions than black workers. Here is Haley’s 2012 State of the Union take on unions. If there’s a politician in the U.S. that hates unions more than Haley, please advice.
She an unapologetic supporter of public tax money for private schools and has historically allowed poorer district schools to crumble in hopes of failure and transfer of students to for-profit charter and private schools. And let me emphasize that just because the term “public” charter schools is in the title, outside private management can be paid obscene amounts of money to run those schools.
Knowing what you now know, here is today’s local blazing Haley headline in the wake of the savage Charleston murders; HALEY: “TAKE IT DOWN.” In a highly orchestrated press conference flanked by the imperative presence of black legislators, Haley wants that darn Confederate flag removed from Statehouse grounds, pronto and stuffed into a museum somewhere. No, I didn’t say she wanted to rescind every gubernatorial move that has repressed and effectively ruined the lives of the vast majority of South Carolina African-American citizens. She just wants what is now that embarrassing piece of cloth, gone from statehouse grounds.
Apparently the fact that the 21-year-old human detritus charged with killing 9 black cult members, adored the flag and made flag references and images a core part of a “manifesto” on a web site, moved the governor to action. Not to mention the national press and a possibility of being on the ticket of one of the oddball candidates for the Republican presidential nomination.
The Washington Post reports that of recent times, the flags presence on the grounds of the State Capital, didn’t seem to bother Haley in the least. Possibly the most vomit-inducing quote from the Haley story went something like this: “My hope is that by removing a symbol that divides us, we can move our state forward in harmony, and we can honor the nine blessed souls who are now in Heaven.” Ms. Haley, the greatest homage you could pay these “blessed souls” (martyrs to racism) would be to reverse virtually all anti-black state legislation that clogs the statutory history of South Carolina.
All Republican state legislators quoted by the local paper were being highly conciliatory about the issue. They promised that the offending fabric would be the object of intense concentration, ASAP. If not, Haley has promised to call state senators and representatives into a special session to get the job of removal completed. According to a lawyer representative from a pollution-laden district that’s losing its constituents to cancer and other alleged pollution contributors, time’s a wastin’. To vote before reconvening next January, an amendment would be required to the state’s Sine Die Adjournment rules. A two-thirds majority vote would be required for such an amendment.
So I suspect, at the very least, the flag will be removed. It’s a hot button issue at present, but I dare say, no racist-tinged mind will be changed because of the flag issue. That will take the election of an overwhelming number of enlightened Democrats who managed to change their own history of racist behavior. The new progressive leadership must insist that blacks be treated as full-fledged citizens of the state of South Carolina.

Ann Coulter is an Idiot

Ann Coulter (Fox News)
Ann Coulter is an Idiot - but you knew that anyway.

Republicans keep restrictions on gun-violence studies

by Rachael Bade
UNITED STATES - MAY 13: Sen. Pat Toomey, R-Pa., speaks at a news conference held by Citizens Against Government Waste at the Phoenix Park Hotel to release the 2015 Congressional Pig Book which identifies pork-barrel spending in Congress, May 13, 2015. (Photo By Tom Williams/CQ Roll Call) (CQ Roll Call via AP Images)In the aftermath of the latest mass shooting in Charleston, South Carolina, House Republicans rebuffed a Democratic effort to effectively allow health researchers to study gun violence and make recommendations — suggesting they’re still a long way from considering any new gun-control restrictions.
The House Appropriations Committee on Tuesday rejected, 19-32, an amendment from top Democratic appropriator Nita Lowey (D-N.Y.) that would allow the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to study the underlying causes of gun violence.
The CDC hasn’t done any such research since 1996, when the National Rifle Association accused it of trying to use science to promote gun control. Congress threatened to totally defund the agency if the work continued, and appropriators ever since have included a prohibition on funding that kind of research with spending bills.
A House Republican Cabal staffer said the existing provision technically doesn’t bar gun-violence research. Rather, it blocks any gun-control advocacy by the CDC. However, Republicans would consider any CDC findings that recommend limitations on guns to be gun-control advocacy.
Echoing calls from President Barack Obama to jump-start gun research, Democrats on Tuesday tried to strike that language.
“In Charleston, in Newtown, several times in Colorado and elsewhere … we find out the warning signs after shots were fired,” Lowey said. “This is not about a gun registry. There is no gun confiscation. There is absolutely no harm to the Second Amendment. This is about research. My amendment is about research, nothing more.”
Across the Hill campus, senators — mostly Democrats — this week have been talking about gun control in the wake of last week’s shooting that killed nine African Americans attending a bible study. Pat Toomey (R-Penn.) and Joe Manchin (D-W.V.) are considering re-introducing their background checks bill that failed several years ago despite bipartisan support.
But the Republican-misled House, so far, has shown little interest in such legislation. And the Republican Cabal appropriators’ response to the research amendment Tuesday serves as a reminder that the same dynamic remains in place.
Democrats lined up to speak on the amendment at the hearing. Rep. Mike Quigley (D-Ill.) shared details of a survey that found Chicago-based elementary kids were more afraid of getting shot than getting braces.
Rep. Rosa DeLauro (D-Conn.) tried to emphasize that this was research, nothing else: “The notion that somehow research is our enemy is just wrong-headed. And for people to chip away at our ability to investigate efforts that are about public health and prevention, is wrong-headed. There is no reason not to fund this research.”
The only response from Republicans was made by  Tom Cole (R-Okla.), who kept his comments brief and simply said Democrats didn’t seem to care about striking this provision when they were in power.
“It’s striking to me that neither side — and they’ve both been in the majority since this provision was put in there — have seen fit to repeal it,” the subcommittee chairman said. “We don’t think this place is the appropriate forum for a debate over the Second Amendment.”
Lowey tried to argue that the CDC — one of the few agencies that Republicans want to give a funding boost — engages in a variety of health research, including studies that came up with seat belts and airbags to protect people in crashes. The Republican Cabal (and NRA) worry, however, is that study findings will encourage restrictions on guns.
“When it comes to gun violence, my friend, this committee won’t give one dime for … research that is killing Americans by the thousands,” Lowey said. “The second amendment is threatened by science?… This committee is on a troubling path.”

Will The Wingnuts Reject (Again) A Report on the Threat of Wingnut Extremism?

OK, that was a rhetorical question.
A new report from New America, released a week after a white supremacist gunned down nine people in a black church in Charleston, finds that since the September 11, 2001, attacks, “nearly twice as many people have been killed by white supremacists, anti-government fanatics and other non-muslim... MORE

White Supremacists Have Killed More People Than Jihadists In U.S. Since 9/11

Dylann Roof
And this is surprising, how?

White Supremacist Cabal That Influenced Roof Is Paid For With Your Tax Dollars

White Supremacist Group That Influenced Roof Is Paid For With Your Tax Dollars
Now, this is a real Outrage

James O’Keefe Discovers His Osama Bin Laden Stunt Landed Him On No-Fly List

From the "It couldn't have happened to a 'NICER' guy" Department:
Screenshot from O'Keefe's videoJames O’Keefe is now on the no-fly list after he snuck into the country wearing an Osama Bin Laden costume.
***
Please note the sarcasm in the header above. We are still laughing here in the office at this one.

Protesters Shut Down Police Department After Police Union Calls Them ‘Race-Baiters’

Protesters Shut Down Police Dept. After Police Union Calls Them ‘Race-Baiters’ (VIDEO)We are having a national conversation on systemic racism and police brutality because of demonstrations like this.

Russia Backing Texas Succession Movement

Photo CC by Texas State Library and Archives Commission Nathan Smith styles himself the “foreign minister” for the Texas National Movement, a group of people dedicated to engaging in treason against...

Friday, June 26, 2015

The Daily Drift

Breaking News: Well, SCOTUS did it again. They made the correct decision and the troglodytes of wingnutistan are having horrific fits of apoplexy and conniptions (and any wingnut heads that did not explode yesterday are doing so today). Why you ask - Gay Marriage is a legal right everywhere in the USA, now.
Hey, wingnuts, yeah we're talking to you ...!  
 
The Truth Be Told is read in 204 countries around the world.
 
Republicans hate all things American, especially all things Native American  ... !
Today is - National Canoe Day
 
Don't forget to visit our sister blog Carolina Naturally

Some of our readers today have been in:
The Americas
Argentina - Brazil - Canada - Colombia - Dominican Republic - Ecuador - Mexico - Panama - Peru  
Puerto Rico - United States - Uruguay
Europe
Belgium - Bosnia/Herzegovina - Bulgaria - Croatia - Czech Republic - England - France - Germany  
Greece - Iceland - Italy - Netherlands - Norway -  Poland - Portugal - Russia -  Scotland - Slovenia  
Spain - Ukraine - Wales
Asia
Burma - China - India - Indonesia - Malaysia - Mauritius - Saudi Arabia
Africa
Algeria - Egypt - Libya - South Africa - Tunisia
The Pacific
Australia - Philippines

Climate Change Health Risk Is A 'Medical Emergency', Experts Warn

Climate Change Health Risk Is A 'Medical Emergency', Experts Warn"We see climate change as a major health issue, and that's often neglected in policy debates," Anthony Costello told reporters at a briefing in London.

The UN surprises everyone with a breakthrough deal to slow deforestation

A surprise deal emerged from UN climate negotiations in Bonn, Germany, this week: diplomats managed to reach a key agreement to compensate developing nations that agree to preserve their forests. And environmental and civil society groups had generally nice things to say about the deal.Deforestation has a huge effect on climate change. Activities like slash-and-burn agriculture account for nearly 20 percent of greenhouse gases emissions, according to the UN. Trees, of course, also play a key role in slowing climate change by pulling CO2 out of the atmosphere.
Historically, deforestation has been an especially vexing probably for environmentalists, raising the concern of climate hawks and conservationists alike. This week’s agreement straightens out some key details of an initiative — called Reducing Emissions From Deforestation and Forest Degradation, or REDD+ — that negotiators hope will provide developing, forest-rich countries with incentives to slow and eventually halt logging of forested land.

Supreme Court Declares Warrantless Searches Of Hotel Registries Unconstitutional

Supreme_Court.jpg
The U.S. Supreme Court struck down warrantless searches of hotel registries in a 5-4 decision on Monday. Justice Sotomayor wrote the majority opinion in the case of City of Los Angeles v. Patel, scoring a victory for privacy advocates, who argued that Los Angeles’ city law violated the Fourth Amendment’s prohibition on unlawful searches without probable cause.
In writing her decision, Sotomayor stated:
A hotel owner who refuses to give an officer access to his or her registry can be arrested on the spot. The court has held that business owners cannot reasonably be put to this kind of choice.
Sotomayor was joined in protecting privacy rights by liberal justices Stephen Breyer, Elena Kagan and Ruth Bader Ginsburg as well as swing justice Anthony Kennedy. The four wingnute justices — Chief Justice John Roberts, Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Antonin Scalia dissented. Each of them felt the government should have the right to obtain hotel registries without first establishing probable cause.
In his dissent, Justice Scalia argued:
The private pain and public costs imposed by drug dealing, prostitution, and human trafficking are beyond contention, and motels provide an obvious haven for those who trade in human misery.
While wingnuts often like to claim that they are the party of less government, the wingnut justices on the Supreme Court aligned themselves with more government intrusion into the lives of individuals and small business owners. By contrast, the liberals on the court took the side of defending privacy and the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.
While reasonable people can disagree on how much information citizens should be required to divulge to law enforcement officers when no probably cause exists, there can be no argument that wingnuts on the court have taken the position advocating more government when it comes to matters surrounding personal privacy. Antonin Scalia, in particular, has argued that the state has a right to violate the Bill of Rights because drug dealers and prostitutes might purchase a night in a hotel room, and that alone is reason enough in his warped  mind to disregard the Constitution of the United States.