Ann Coulter thinks it's "Adios America" unless we can keep out
overweight women, the physically disabled, and the visually impaired…
Ann Coulter apparently thinks “This is Sparta!”
Historian Susan B. Pomeroy speaks of the “eugenic principles” which
“underlie much of Spartan demographic engineering.”
As most people likely know by now, the Spartans took
Spartan Exceptionalism very seriously indeed, to the extent that if you
were not a worthy physical specimen, you were not worthy of life as a
Spartan.
If Coulter doesn’t want to actually expose unwanted
infants, she seems to be just as fanatical about imposing certain
physical standards on immigrants, and has in the past even embraced the
eugenic principle of killing some people to intimidate others – namely,
liberals.
She also recently
whined to Breitbart,
while promoting her book “Adios America,” that “When I’m in charge of
immigration (after our 10 year moratorium), I will not admit overweight
girls.”
It is difficult to see how barring overweight girls
from entering the country will save America, but this is Ann Coulter and
we shouldn’t expect her to make sense.
Perhaps she should re-title her book, “Adios Overweight Girls”?
Not so fast! She has now added more “undesirables” to her list.
Her
latest method of demographic engineering is to keep out the disabled:
The INS has waived the
English-language requirements for many immigrants, and it’s not just —
that obviously goes to the heart of it, are you switching allegiance, do
you love this country? — but beyond that, how about the wheelchair-only
section? How about the section for the blind? Look, wish these people
well, but we’re not running an international charity here.
We are also not running Sparta.
Regardless, her book would now be titled, “Adios Overweight Girls, the Wheelchair Bound, and Blind People.”
None of this should be surprising. In a 2012 post-election-day column, America Nears El Tipping Pointo, she wrote,
Any election analysis that doesn’t deal with the implacable fact of America’s changing demographics is bound to be wrong.
Perhaps the reason elections maven Michael Barone
was so shockingly off in his election prediction this year was that, in
the biggest mistake of his career, Barone has been assuring us for years
that most of these Third World immigrants pouring into the country
would go the way of Italian immigrants and become Republicans. They’re
hardworking! They have family values!
Maybe at first, but not after coming here, having illegitimate children and going on welfare.
And don’t forget the other undesirables.
We already know how she feels about jews, that they just haven’t quite become “perfected” yet by becoming 'christians'.
How she feels about muslims might best be expressed
by her claim that “News magazines don’t kill people, muslims do.”
Given that she
called Obama
a “retard” during the third debate between Romney and the president in
2012, we can guess the mentally disabled make her short list as well.
Well…that will certainly save America for future generations of Joe McCarthyites.
Of course, on the pedestal of the Statue of Liberty
we find the words, “Give me your tired, your poor/Your huddled masses
yearning to breathe free,” a spirit alien to Coulter, and to her hatred
of the constructed Other.[3] The statue that welcomed so many
generations of immigrants doesn’t exclude overweight girls, the
physically disabled, or the visually impaired.
Coulter’s reactionary demographic engineering is
entirely out of step with the spirit of America, not only as captured on
by Statue of Liberty, but by recent polling numbers.
We have already seen that nearly three in four Americans favor permitting undocumented immigrants to remain in the U.S.
And President Obama has just promised to keep fighting for undocumented immigrants.
It would no doubt gall Ann Coulter to see our first
black president, allegedly both a Muslim and a Kenyan, in lockstep with
current American attitudes, that is if she exhibited any self awareness
at all.
The perfect world of Ann Coulter would be all white, all “christian,” and, it goes without saying, uniformly Republican.
It would, in short, with its commitment to ethnic
nationalism and demographic engineering, more closely resemble Nazi
Germany than the United States of America.
No comments:
Post a Comment