At a Goffstown, New Hampshire town meeting on Monday, New Jersey's Chris Christie advocated adopting a “military approach” to dealing with China.
Although the New Jersey moron has not officially kicked off his
candidacy, his foray into discussing foreign policy in the first GOP
pretender primary state, left little doubt about his intentions.
Christie told the town hall audience
that America needed to take a “military approach” and let the
Chinese ”know there are limits to what they’re allowed to do.” In
discussing China’s activity in the South China Sea, Christie added:
That is an issue that we can handle militarily by going out there and making sure that we show them that we don’t respect their claims to these artificial islands in the South China Sea that they’re building, that they’re saying are theirs that are hundreds and hundreds of miles from the coast of China and are clearly in international waters. We need to send that signal to the Chinese very clearly that we do not acknowledge nor will we respect their claims to those areas.
Christie has been trying to gain traction
in the crowded GOP pretender field, but he has been unable to set
himself apart from other candidates. Social wingnuts distrust him,
and free market fundamentalists have better options as well.
Chris Christie’s comments on China appear to be an
effort to win over neo-wingnut foreign policy hawks. Though Jeb Bush and South Carolina's Lindsey Graham
may also be vying to carve out that niche, Chris Christie raised the
ante by hinting at taking military action against China.
The problem for Christie is that talk is
cheap and while his calls for military action may sound like tough talk,
he lacks a realistic plan for how to conduct such action without
triggering potentially dangerous consequences. It is one thing to engage
in bellicose saber-rattling rhetoric on the campaign trail to drum up
votes, and quite another matter to engage in a confrontation with
China’s large military force.
Chris Christie’s rhetoric is irresponsible, and
America would do better to reject him in favor of a more sober and
diplomatic leader. The last Republican president launched a costly and
needless war in Iraq. One can only imagine how much worse trying to
start a war with China would turn out.
No comments:
Post a Comment