The state's that would be most affected by ending Obamacare
subsidies, also states the Republican Cabal needs to win, to keep control of the
Senate.…
With a Supreme Court ruling on the King v Burwell case looming,
the GOP has no contingency plan to help the nearly 6.5 million
Americans in 34 states who will be hurt by a potential court decision
eliminating the federal subsidies, made available through the Affordable
Care Act (ACA). At first blush, a Supreme Court ruling that strikes at
the heart of Obamacare would seem like a clear Republican victory.
However, because such a ruling would have a profound
impact on a number of crucial battleground states in 2016, the ruling would create a backlash against Republicans in states necessary to win
the 2016 presidential election. Also, many of the state’s that would be
most affected by an end to federal Obamacare subsidies are also states
with key races for control of the U.S. Senate. Ironically, Republicans
who have spent the past half-decade trying to repeal Obamacare, may soon
discover that a Supreme Court decision in their favor will prove
a Pyrrhic victory that costs them control of the U.S. Senate.
For example, the state that stands to lose the most
from an end to tax credits made available by the federal exchange is
Florida. 1.488 million Florida residents benefit from the Obamacare federal exchange subsidies, with their average annual tax credit adding up to over 3500 dollars per person. Ironically, the nation’s most Obamacare dependent city is the Republican working class Miami suburb of Hialeah, Florida,
where 37 percent of city residents were uninsured before Obamacare
passed, and roughly another 37 percent were subsidized by public
insurance through Medicare or Medicaid.
If the Supreme Court ends the federal exchange
subsidies, not all voters will blame the GOP for taking away their
affordable health care coverage. However, if even a small percentage of
the 1.488 million Floridians assign blame where it belongs, the
Republicans will have virtually no chance of holding onto the Senate
seat being vacated by Republican pretender hopeful Marco Rubio.
Florida would be the biggest loser if the Supreme
Court nixes the federal exchanges, but it is not the only state with a
pivotal Senate race that would lose big. 10 of the 14 states that stand
the most to lose if Obamacare subsidies are gutted by the Supreme Court
are states where Republicans must defend a Senate seat in 2016. If the
Supreme Court elects to pull the subsidies from millions of Americans,
the backlash could have a direct impact on vulnerable incumbent Senators
in several of those states.
Pat Toomey (PA), Ron Johnson (WI), Mark Kirk (IL), Rob Portman (OH), and Richard Burr (NC) seem particularly vulnerable, and each of them represent states that are among those that stand the most to lose if the federal exchanges are ended.
The irony that a wingnut Supreme Court ruling
could have the unintended consequence of throwing Republicans out as the
majority party in the U.S. Senate, only underscores the additional
irony that it is Republican voters who are Obamacare’s prime
beneficiaries. While Republican voters may be critical of Obamacare because
they fail to understand it, they are disproportionately helped by the
program.
An Urban Institute study
on who would lose insurance if the Supreme Court declares the federal
tax credits illegal, found that white lower and middle-income
Southerners would be the biggest losers if the Obamacare subsidies are
eliminated. At some level, this Republican-leaning bloc of voters will have
only themselves to blame. However, because Republicans cannot even
afford to lose a handful of these voters in Senate battleground states
like Florida, Georgia, and North Carolina, the wingnut Roberts Court could end up ironically becoming the Republican Cabal’s
worst enemy.
No comments:
Post a Comment