In a decisive 7-2 ruling, the Oklahoma Supreme Court
has ruled that the ten commandments monument erected at the State
Capitol must be removed. The monument was a gift from Republican Mike Ritze. However, plaintiffs argued that the
monument’s placement at the Capitol involved the use of public property
for the benefit of a specific religion. They argued, and the court
agreed, that the Oklahoma Constitution clearly prohibits such a display
promoting one religion over others.
No public money or property shall ever be appropriated, applied, donated, or used, directly or indirectly, for the use, benefit, or support of any sect, church, denomination, or system of religion, or for the use, benefit, or support of any priest, preacher, minister, or other religious teacher or dignitary, or sectarian institution as such.
Brady Henderson, the legal director for the ACLU of Oklahoma praised the ruling, stating:
I think that at the end of the day it is the right decision simply because it acknowledges limits on the government’s power to effectively decide what religious edicts are right and wrong.
Republican Mary Fallin, was predictably upset by the ruling, and she vowed to work with the state’s Attorney General to “evaluate the state’s legal options moving forward”.
While
many evangelical 'christians' are sure to express their displeasure with
the court’s decision, it is clear that the state’s constitution
prohibits such blatant displays privileging a specific religion over all
others. Many 'christian' wingnutss believe that they follow the “one
true religion” and that all others should be subjected to their belief
system. However, in a society that values the separation of cult and
state, imposing one’s own religion upon others is against the law. The
state’s Supreme Court has made it clear that the law applies even in
Oklahoma.
No comments:
Post a Comment