Hillary Clinton doesn’t just want to make college
free. The Democratic presidential candidate wants to kill college debt,
and by doing so she is striking at the heart of the Republican plan to
make the richer wealthier and everyone else poor.
In a post on Medium, Clinton laid out the basics of her New College Compact:
– Under the New College Compact, no student should have to borrow to pay tuition at a public college.
– Schools will have to control their costs and show more accountability to their students.
– States will have to meet their obligation to invest in higher education.
– The federal government will increase its investment in education, and won’t profit off student loans.
– And millions with student debt will be able to refinance it at lower rates.
That’s my plan. It’s ambitious — and we
should be ambitious. But it’s also achievable. And it would make a big
difference in people’s lives.
Clinton’s plan adds the Elizabeth Warren inspired
wrinkle of allowing students to refinance their loans. A vital component
of every Republican economic plan involves the government profiting off
of student loan debt to pay for tax cuts to the wealthiest Americans.
Former Sec. of State Clinton’s proposal ends this practice by changing
the way the federal government encourages higher education.
Under Clinton, the government would take steps to
incentivize states to increase funding for higher education while
working with colleges and universities to lower the cost of attendance.
The plan would be paid for by limiting tax deductions for the wealthy.
Like all good policy proposals, the Clinton plan
takes a little from the left and a little from the right and adds some
twists that are unique to the candidate. Republicans are opposed to any
plan that lowers student debt and makes college more affordable.
Increasing economic opportunity is a concept that runs counter to the
values of the lunatic fringe.
The
idea that economic opportunity can be increased by forcing the
wealthiest Americans to pay more pushes Republicans over the edge. The
national discussion on higher education is rapidly changing. The debate
has shifted beyond expanding Pell Grants and into fundamentally changing
an education system that is causing crippling debt more often than it
aids economic advancement.
No comments:
Post a Comment