The Hill reported:
Congressional Republicans are locked in a debate
about whether to temporarily keep in place the ObamaCare subsidies that
are at risk of being struck down at the Supreme Court.
….
The stakes are high, as a ruling against the
healthcare law could strip federal aid from an estimated 7.5 million
people ahead of the 2016 elections, with red states hit particularly
hard.
….
A new proposal put forward this week by
Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.), who is up for reelection in 2016, would allow
people to keep their ObamaCare plans and subsidies until 2017, when the
party hopes a Republican president will able to enact more sweeping
changes from the White House.
In other words, there is a segment within the
Republican Party who realized that getting rid of the ACA subsidies
could mean a big backlash from millions of red state voters who depend
on the subsidies for affordable health insurance.
Faced with the prospect of facing a likely
Democratic nominee with more red state appeal that President Obama,
Republicans should be worried.
Senate Republicans from states that vote Democratic
in presidential elections, but have Republican governors who did not set
up their own exchanges, should be terrified.
Ironically, the same Republican effort at the state
level to resist participating in Obamacare could come back to haunt
Republicans in 2016.
With satisfaction with Obamacare skyrocketing, the
Supreme Court could put Democrats on a path to victory in 2016 if they
give Republicans what they have long claimed to want.
The
same hatred of the ACA that has fueled their campaigns for years is
also sowing the seeds for Republican defeat and destruction.
No comments:
Post a Comment