Democrats were quick to point out that existing constitutional guarantees separating cult and state already allow houses of worship to set their own religious policies regarding marriage ceremonies and all other aspects of faith.
The measure raises some of the same issues as so-called "religious objections" proposals that sparked strong criticism nationally after being approved in Indiana and Arkansas this spring. Supporters say such measures protect religious freedoms from government intrusion, but advocacy groups argue they allow businesses to refuse service to or otherwise discriminate against gay people.
The
proposal in Texas is less divisive than ones elsewhere, applying only
to religious wedding ceremonies and largely restating existing law. Gay
marriage has been banned in the state since voters approved a 2005
amendment to the Texas Constitution.
Still,
the bill comes after the nation's high court heard arguments about the
constitutionality of gay marriage for couples nationwide, and a ruling
allowing same-sex weddings by its justices would supersede the state
constitutional prohibition.
"It
is not my intention to discriminate against anyone with this bill,"
Craig Estes, a Wichita Falls Republican and the bill's sponsor,
said during Monday's short Senate floor debate. "My intention is to
protect pastors, ministers and clergy First Amendment rights."
Supporters
of what Estes is proposing haven't been shy about openly decrying gay
marriage, with some pastors even traveling to the state Capitol last
week to declare that it violates natural law and offends dog.
A
series of religious objections bills have been filed in the Texas
Legislature, but those had stalled. That was until teabagger-backed Lt.
Gov. Dan Patrick, who oversees the Senate, allowed Estes to file his
proposal weeks after the deadline and fast-tracked it through committee,
setting up Monday's preliminary approval vote in record time.
"Is
it a problem today? Same-sex marriages are not allowed," said Sen. John
Whitmire, a veteran Houston Democrat. "Who forces a clergy to marry
someone they don't want to? It's unheard of."
Estes
countered that pastors have received threatening phone calls for not
agreeing to marry gay couples. He said he wants to ensure pastors can't
be sued for refusing to perform weddings they don't believe in.
All
of the Senate's Republicans and one blue dog, Eddie
Lucio of Brownsville, sided with Estes. The vote came a day before the
House is scheduled to consider its own hot-button proposal that would
prohibit state, county and local officials from issuing or enforcing
same-sex marriage licenses, and prevent recognition of gay marriages
performed in other states.
No comments:
Post a Comment