In “Obama Bypasses Dog and Netanyahu,” CPAC darling Dr. Laurie Roth
(having that title sure doesn’t make them smarter does it?) argues that
if you oppose Benjamin Netanyahu, you oppose Dog. Oh sweet little baby
Jesus, no!
The “Annie Oakley of the Airwaves” writes at Matt Barber’s BarbWire that,
Anyone or anything connected with the Dog of the Holy Bible will be
attacked and bypassed by Obama and his progressive robots. As we all
know by now Obama had no congratulations or words of any kind for
Benjamin Netanyahu though BiBi won huge. Funny how all the other ‘big
boy’ leaders called to congratulate him but not Obama. John Kerry saying
something pathetic from afar and too late doesn’t cut the cheese folks.
Obama is most certainly against Netanyahu because he represents the
Jews and Israel and won’t be intimidated into giving away more land or
kissing up to the Islamic agenda….which is simply — destroy Israel.
That’s quite a leap (of faith, shall we say?). Not a
word here about how her pal “Bibi” came to the United States and tried
to wrest control of America’s foreign policy away from the man in whom
that control is vested by the United States Constitution: the President
of the United States.
That would be Barack H. Obama.
It was a coup attempt, pure and simple.
A simple appeal to human nature would be enough to
tell most people Obama isn’t going to rush to a phone and congratulate
the man who did this to him. Who would? The worst thing that could
happen for the peace process was a Netanyahu victory. It makes Obama’s
job of securing a nuclear weapons-free future with Iran that much more
difficult.
Now what “Doctor” Roth fails to understand is that
while “Bibi” has a right to a foreign policy, so does the United States.
If Roth is so eager for war, she should make sure she is first in line
at the recruiting office the morning Israeli jets attack Iran.
And to automatically accuse Obama of being
anti-Israel because he opposes Netanyahu is absurd. Not surprising,
because the same defense was used of Bush’s attack on Iraq in 2003. If
you oppose Bush you oppose the United States and if you oppose the
United States you oppose God himself.
Then Roth gets all dramatic. “Let’s cut to the bottom line,” she says.
“Obama has invested, committed to and is passionate
about completing his transformational plans for America,” and I guess we
have to give her credit for recognizing that Congress is “behind in
every area.”
She wants them to “fight Obama and his evil
transformation plans” (good luck with that; they’re too busy fighting
each other over how extreme they want to be):
That means, regular and
thought out media statements…defunding all that Obama touches, such as
Obamacare, the FCC Internet take over, amnesty for starters. “Use the
power you have.”
A “thought-out” media statement? From a Republican?
Talk about not having a prayer…
So Obamacare, which gives healthcare to up to 20
million people (and incidentally, promises my son a future), is “evil
and transformational.” The FCC “Internet take over” [sic] (Should be one
word, ‘takeover’ Doc), which is actually just the preservation of the
open Internet we’ve always had, and long overdue, is also “evil and
transformational,” and amnesty! I’m not sure whatever happened to the
much-vaunted Christian charity but it is nowhere in evidence at
BarbWire.
But she’s not through drowning in nonsense, claiming
that “Obama believes down to his bone marrow in a one world Government
and that America must submit to the UN instead of our US Constitution,
sovereignty and Judeo/Christian values” (she provides no evidence for
this, of course).
As for Obama, well…
“His heart and mind set are all wrapped up in Communism, fascism, creating an Islamic caliphate, and Internationalism.”
She needs to plop that tinfoil hat down on her head
right now. Try to wrap your head around somebody being all these things
at once:
A. A communist
B. A fascist
C. A radical Islamist
D. An “internationalist”
There can be no “all of the above” so there is no
choice “E.” Fascism was an early 20th century response TO communism and
diametrically opposed to it, the extreme right vs. the extreme left. A
theocrat, which is what a radical Islamist would have to be, is
something completely different from the other two. And I’m not even sure
how to response to the charge of being an “internationalist.” If it
means no country is above the law, then I fail to see what her complaint
is.
There follows the inevitable nonsense about being persecuted, and then come the inevitable threats:
The ‘poser’ type Christians are great. Obama loves them because they are
useful idiots and pawns to manipulate around the game board to achieve
his goals. Netanyahu and other patriots who understand the price of
freedom and its preservation will always be hated by Obama.
What’s interesting here is the claim that Netanyahu,
an Israeli, is somehow a “patriot.” He may be a patriot to Israel, but
he’s no American patriot. I think Roth’s true colors are showing here.
Her devotion is not to her own country, but to a foreign country.
American House and Senate, Governors in all 50 states, those running for
state and federal elections and you who intend to run for President had
better get in your prayer closets and take stock in who you are. What
do you really stand for and are you for sale or not? We are taking on
the stark face of evil and tyranny whether you want to believe it or
not. Wake up America.
Oh,
we’ve seen the face of tyranny clear enough. It IS for sale (in fact
its bought and sold already, by the Kochs) and it’s wrapped in a flag
and carrying a cross. In fact, it looks a lot like Dr. Laurie Roth.