Most self-identifying "libertarians"
actually subscribe to a bankrupt ideology. What if they all opened their
eyes?
by Edwin Lyngar
The rise of Bernie Sanders feels familiar to me. When I was a libertarian-leaning Republican, I was a delegate for Ron Paul
in the 2008 Nevada State Convention. Paul’s supporters were passionate
if a bit nutty, but change seemed, if only for a moment, possible. The
problem was that the ideology behind the candidate was bankrupt. The
experience was the beginning of the end of my affiliation with
simplistic libertarian blather and Republican cabal politics altogether, but Paul’s
rise was driven by the same frustration and anger that is now propelling
Sanders.
For
too long, the anger and passion has been driven by teabagger troglodytes and
libertarians. Their solution seems to be throwing more gasoline on a
trailer-park fire. Inequality? Cut taxes for the wealthy and implement a
“
flat tax.” Poverty?
Eliminate the social safety net and cut food stamps. Those not actively
making problems worse are obsessed with non-stories and fictitious
“scandals,” featuring Benghazi, Jade Helm, e-mail servers or any of the
other innumerable, invented outrages.
Even issues I care deeply
about, like prison reform, can distract. Our country grows more lopsided
by the day, and despite big wins on gay marriage and health care, too
many trends are moving in the wrong direction. Are we a society that
works for people or are we in something like feudalism, where
corporations and private organization all but own their employees?
The
current problem with politics, the economy and culture comes from
treating human beings like just another business asset to be exploited
or replaced. We say a person’s value is what the “market will bear,” and
if the market has no use for a particular human, he or she has no
inherent worth. That’s pretty sick. Should we just let them starve to
death? For the radical right, the answer is an enthusiastic
“absolutely.” If all else fails, deport them.
I listen to Donald
Trump talk. He says what I just wrote without sarcasm or a trace of
humanity. He and other politicians agree with Sanders’ assessment of
reality, but their solutions could not be more different. Trump’s only
idea is to blame Mexicans. He embraces the idea of “individual success,”
as if it all takes place in a complete vacuum, without outside help or
public investment. It’s an argument that sways only the most ignorant
and upwardly mobile of young men. It’s also an absurd statement coming
from a guy who inherited millions of dollars. But even conservatives who
recognize these ideas as folly still have a work around. Rather than
tackle the problems, they buy their own kids a ticket an Ivy League
school, so at least their progeny have a chance of joining the exploiter
class. This isn’t so much a society as a pyramid scheme.
Corporations
benefit from weak labor and a beaten down population. Many are almost
too powerful to tame. Walmart generates more money in sales in a year
than the
GDP of Norway. (Don’t
worry I’m sure it doesn’t do anything evil with all that money.)
Walmart and like-sized corporations are no longer businesses. They are
instead autonomous, totalitarian states existing right in our own
nation. They care only for their own interests, unconcerned with
national borders or anything like the public good.
Yet, wingnuts still vilify the government. It’s baffling, but I totally get
it. I was there and I said those words. I was parroting “conventional
wisdom,” the political equivalent of talking about the weather. It’s so
trite and predicable that it’s become a national punch line. Flat tire?
Thanks Obama! Getting fat? Blame Obamacare! Wife left? Damn government!
Our national, running gag is not only tiresome, it lacks anything
resembling truth. It’s understandable to hate the government, because
it’s easy and satisfying, but the government didn’t foreclose on your
house, cut your paycheck or send your job to China. Ranting and raving
about the government never helped anyone do anything.
Which brings us back to Bernie Sanders.
Sanders
calls himself a socialist, which is just about as big an American
insult as you get. Conventional politicians and business people
decry
the evils of socialism, except when they are wallowing in it. America
has the most generous socialist government that has ever existed in
human history,
but it only applies to millionaires. If you’re
on the board of a bank or massive corporation, the government has
unlimited socialism for you. No cost loans, favorable bankruptcy laws,
bailouts and tax breaks without limit. At the same time, unemployed
students cannot discharge student loans no matter how bleak their
financial circumstances. Socialism has been inverted. Rather than
deployed for the poor and struggling, it’s doled out endlessly to people
who don’t need it.
Sanders not only points out how much we coddle
the super wealthy, but he also has some actual solutions. Higher taxes
for some, enlarge the social safety net and reduce the cost of higher
education, just for example. Sanders’ messages don’t conform to the
partisan binary we have the gall to call “democracy.” It sounds
different, because politicians still dust off the same talking points.
Hard work, play by the rules, love Jesus, yada, yada, yada. It’s the
same crap they’ve been peddling since Reagan and just as effective. If I
have to listen to one more Republican worshiping at the alter of Ronald
Reagan, I think I might lose it.
You can’t blame conniving,
selfish politicians for doing what works. They only play to the willing
cameras, repeating meaningless lines that someone has wrote or some
consultant has poll tested. Our entire political debate has been reduced
to a bad reality show, deductions for gaffes, stumbles and extramarital
affairs, and extra credit for soundbites and signing pledges.
The majority has ceased to rule here. Most people don’t even bother to vote, and that’s by design. Liberal ideas would
always
win if everyone voted, which is why there is such a nonstop, furious
attack on voting by the right. America is under siege by a small,
insular aristocracy, and they won’t go down without a fight. It’s
telling that we could easily see candidates from only two “noble”
families, the Bushes and the Clintons, in our next election. We need no
more perfect example of American feudalism than power being passed back
and forth between ruling houses.
Despite my conviction that Sanders
could win, I find myself fighting hopelessness over what has become the
“narrative.” It’s not only insipid talking heads or professional
pundits spouting conventional wisdom. On a home-grown
podcast,
I chatted up two fellow liberals who both expressed great support for
Sanders, but at the same time they both insisted that “he can’t possibly
win,” tapping into my own deep cynicism. I worry that change cannot
happen so long as the angry, mostly white and gullible, keep protecting
their shrinking piece of the pie.
I offer only one ray of hope in
the form of Shakespearean-level irony. The fuming, hate-filled and false
rhetoric that has labeled Obama a “socialist” might have actually
removed the sting from the insult to the point that is now meaningless.
The insults have grown so far from reality that there is nothing
credible for the professional furious to spew.
Even though the
idea of socialism is anathema to libertarians, the two groups have a lot
in common, on drug-law reform and the privacy of private sexual conduct
for instance. I also know a lot of purist libertarians who are
horrified by the xenophobia of Trump. We have our differences, and I’ve
put in a lot of effort criticizing the ideology, but libertarians have
much more in common with Sanders than with Mike Huckabee, Rick Santorum
and other values-pimping theocrats.
Despite my appreciation for
his ideas and policies, Sanders, nor any public figure, is the messiah. I
don’t believe in an all powerful savior, political or otherwise, but I
do believe that ideas and people matter, and Sanders offers something
that we haven’t tried before—unabashedly progressive ideas.